feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • War crime trials  (17)
  • 1
    Language: French
    Year of publication: 2008
    Titel der Quelle: Les Cahiers de la Mémoire Contemporaine
    Angaben zur Quelle: 8 (2008) 99-138
    Keywords: War crime trials ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) ; Jews History 1939-1945 ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945)
    Abstract: Argues that Belgian authorities in London played a rather important role in preparing judgements for German war crimes: Marcel de Baer was President of the War Crimes Commission at the London International Assembly and Henri Rolin its Deputy president. Their activity on the international level was, however, not matched by initiative on the national level, though both were members of the legislativ council charged with preparing law texts for the government. Despite a document by the Prime Minister in November 1942, stating that Belgium would do all it could to overcome legal insufficiencies concerning war crimes, only an order was given concerning acts committed by foreigners outside Belgian territory. In public, the minister of Justice, Antoine Delfosse, seemed however, deeply involed in these matters, and was appointed President of the Belgian War Crimes Commission after the war. Reflects on the reasons for the Belgian failure to act at home: anticipation of international decisions as guidelines and relations between Delfosse and those in the government, who prioritized punishing collaborators, i.e. traitors, rather than the German enemy. Argues that no legal or other complications justified tha fact that the Belgian authorities in London, though well aware by December 1942 of the extermination of Jews and the dramatic situation of the Jews in Belgium, remained passive. As of 1943 they could have filled the existing legal gap and enacted a law concerning deportations and persecutions, which would have enabled Belgium to indict the Germans after the war. However, the question of crimes against the Jews in Belgium and the punishment of their perpetrators, did not concern Belgian authorities in London during the war.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Article
    Article
    In:  Yad Vashem Studies 47,1 (2019) 259-266
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2019
    Titel der Quelle: Yad Vashem Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 47,1 (2019) 259-266
    Keywords: Jasch, Hans-Christian; Kaiser, Wolf. ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Influence ; War crime trials
    Note: In English and Hebrew.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2013
    Titel der Quelle: Yad Vashem Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 41,1 (2013) 99-127
    Keywords: War crime trials ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Historiography ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945)
    Abstract: After the war, most of the former Schupo men who took part in the deportation of Jews (arresting them and then guarding the transports) denied knowledge of the true destination of the trains and claimed that they had taken part in the deportation only once or that they had escorted only the trains bound to "harmless" Bergen-Belsen. These claims caused the West German judiciary to adopt the attitude that the Schupo were not accomplices in the mass murder. Based on testimonies and other accounts made by former Schupo members who were deployed in Italy from the fall of 1943 through 1944 (SS Police Regiments 9, 10, 12, 15, and 20), under the command of Jürgen von Kamptz, argues that these servicemen knew about the fate of the Jews who they were escorting. They knew very well what they were doing, and many of them witnessed gassings in Auschwitz and elsewhere. Guard duty on such transports was a desirable assignment for Schupo men because of the good conditions. The testimonies of former Schupo men can provide the researcher with many details concerning the conditions in the transports: the deaths of some prisoners on board, murders of those who attempted to escape, etc.
    Note: In English and Hebrew.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2012
    Titel der Quelle: Yad Vashem Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 40,1 (2012) 75-118
    Keywords: Maj, Tadeusz ; War crime trials ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945)
    Abstract: Dismisses the view that, in contrast with the nationalist Armia Krajowa and Narodowe Siły Zbrojne, left-wing groups such as the communist-led Gwardia Ludowa and its successor Armia Ludowa (AL) were in principle friendly toward the Jews. Examines the court cases of Tadeusz Maj and other members of the left-wing "Świt" unit affiliated with the AL, who after the war were accused of murders of Jews who had fled from Nazi camps to the forests of the Kielce region. The investigation of the murders started in 1948, while the trials of Maj and another defendant, Jan Kozieł, both accused of robbing and killing Jews during the war, opened only in 1954. The proceeding was launched following a factional power struggle in the Polish communist leadership at this time. Maj tried to defend himself by mentioning orders of his superiors and the influence of the prewar antisemitic Sanacja regime's propaganda on him. The materials from the trials of Maj and other members of "Świt" show how intense antisemitic sentiments were among the AL soldiers; they also show that Maj's superiors, if not responsible for the murders, were at least indifferent to them.
    Note: In English and Hebrew.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2013
    Titel der Quelle: Yad Vashem Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 41,2 (2013) 173-209
    Keywords: Arendt, Hannah, ; Eichmann, Adolf, ; War crime trials ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Historiography ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Philosophy
    Abstract: Contends that Arendt's "The Banality of Evil" was greatly misunderstood by contemporaries and by subsequent historiography. Arendt did not belittle the seriousness and monstrosity of what Eichmann had done, neither did she reduce him to being an obedient bureaucrat. Eichmann's main deficiency, according to Arendt, was his inability to think about and understand the meaning of what he did, especially crucial in the situation of Nazism's outright reversal of moral values. Dismisses the continuity between "The Origins of Totalitarianism" and "The Banality of Evil", which many critics have taken for granted; between writing these works, Arendt revised many of her views on evil and morals. Admits that Arendt was wrong when she diminished the significance of antisemitism in Eichmann's motivation. However, her analysis may be valid for other perpetrators of the Holocaust.
    Note: In English and in Hebrew.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2013
    Titel der Quelle: Yad Vashem Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 41,2 (2013) 139-171
    Keywords: Auschwitz (Concentration camp) ; War crime trials ; War crime trials ; War crime trials ; Auschwitz Trial, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 1963-1965
    Abstract: During World War II, Auschwitz was not solely a death camp; it had multiple functions as a concentration, labor, and extermination camp, and its victims included Jews (as the majority) and non-Jews alike. Yet, in the course of time it has come to serve as a metonym for the Holocaust and for genocide. Examines the three postwar trials at which Auschwitz emerged as the paramount symbol of the Holocaust: the Lüneburg trial (also known as "the Belsen trial" or "Kramer trial"), conducted by the British Military Tribunal in September-November 1945; the Höss trial, held in Poland in March 1947; and the Auschwitz trial of 1963-65, held in West Germany. In Lüneburg, many of the defendants had served at Auschwitz before they were transferred to Bergen-Belsen; thus, the tribunal had to consider also the crimes perpetrated in that camp. Although the tribunal was most concerned with crimes perpetrated against British and Allied nationals, and showed much distrust of Jewish witnesses, Jews constituted the majority of witnesses for the prosecution and attested that the fate of Jews in Auschwitz was different from the fate of non-Jews there, and that the Nazis carried out a genocide of Jews. At Höss's trial, the Polish judiciary tried to consider the Nazi genocide of Jews on a par with the mass murder of Slavs, "second in turn" after the Jews. At the Auschwitz trial, much attention was drawn to the murder of political prisoners. However, both the Poles in 1947 and the West Germans in the 1960s focused on the murder of Jews as a distinct element within the panoply of Nazi atrocities.
    Note: In English and in Hebrew.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 1993
    Titel der Quelle: Yad Vashem Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 23 (1993) 295-319
    Keywords: Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Influence ; War crime trials ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945)
    Abstract: During the Second World War the German army collaborated in various degrees with the SS and police in mass annihilation of Jews and other victims, especially in the USSR and Yugoslavia. In rare cases when perpetrators were prosecuted under the Nazi regime, the prosecuted were pardoned by the highest authorities (Hitler, Himmler, etc.). Those who refused to participate in the mass killings were never punished by their superiors; therefore, participation was voluntary to a great extent. Only a small number of perpetrators was prosecuted after the war in the FRG, and in many cases their penalties were not commensurate with their crimes. Some of the perpetrators had brilliant careers as police officers in the 1940s-50s, before they were brought to trial.
    Note: See also in Hebrew.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2012
    Titel der Quelle: Yad Vashem Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 40,2 (2012) 81-106
    Keywords: War crime trials ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Influence
    Abstract: During the German occupation of Latvia, Arājs headed the "lettische Hilfssicherheitspolizei", unofficially known as the "Arājs Kommando". In 1941-43 this volunteer paramilitary unit, operating under the command of the Einsatzkommando 2 and later of Sipo Lettland, murdered no less than 24,000 Jews. In 1945, under a false name, Arājs surrendered to the British in Germany, but in 1949, when his true identity was ascertained, he managed to disappear from the detention camp and went underground. Only in 1975 was Arājs arrested in Frankfurt and brought to trial in Hamburg. In December 1979, after a four-and-a-half year trial involving ca. 130 witnesses from various countries, he was sentenced to life imprisonment, and died in 1988. Notes that while having amassed a huge amount of evidence against Arājs, the West German judicial authorities were unenthusiastic in looking for him before 1974, when he was denounced to them by a Latvian. Characteristically, despite the understandable ethnic solidarity, the Latvian émigré community in West Germany was not prone to support him; it was Latvians who provided the German investigation with items of information on him and eventually "betrayed" him.
    Note: In English and Hebrew.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2012
    Titel der Quelle: Yad Vashem Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 40,2 (2012) 137-171
    Keywords: Eichmann, Adolf, ; War crime trials ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) ; Holocaust survivors ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Influence ; Law
    Abstract: Reconsiders the simplistic view that the Eichmann trial was the watershed event which caused a change in the Israeli attitude toward the Holocaust and its survivors. The revision of Israelis' attitude toward the Nazi mass murder of Jews and the role of the "passive" victims in it was a decade-long process which culminated in the enactment of the Holocaust and Heroism Remembrance Day in 1959. The trial took place within a society that had already begun to revise its attitude toward the Holocaust and the behavior of its victims. It was during the debates in the Knesset over the proper name and date of Holocaust and Heroism Remembrance Day, that the legislators expanded the notion of heroism to include the preservation of human dignity and the very survival of Jews in the Holocaust. From 1959, the commemoration of the Holocaust ceased to be a private matter of the survivors and became a national issue. Contends that the significance of the Eichmann trial is different from previous trials held in Israel in accordance with the Nazis and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) Law (trials of former Kapos in Nazi camps, the "Kasztner trial" of 1954-58). In the Eichmann trial, for the first time, the accused was not a Jewish victim but a Nazi German murderer. The trial became the first platform for survivors to relate their sufferings to a wide audience. It marked a reconciliation between the political parties of Israel over the issue of the Holocaust - the Holocaust ceased to be a tool of inter-party struggle as it had been in the 1950s.
    Note: In English and Hebrew.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Article
    Article
    In:  Yad Vashem Studies 40,2 (2012) 63-80
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2012
    Titel der Quelle: Yad Vashem Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 40,2 (2012) 63-80
    Keywords: Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) ; National socialism ; War crime trials ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) ; Jews History 1939-1945
    Abstract: Barth (1908-1987) was an Austrian who, in 1941-43, served first as a lower-ranking officer with the Sonderkommando 10b of Einsatzgruppe D, and then as a member of the Gestapo in Yugoslavia. In October 1943 he, together with several other German servicemen, surrendered to the British forces in Italy. He was interrogated in October-November 1943 by military intelligence, and also later (he gave testimony at the Einsatzgruppen trial held in Nuremberg in 1947-48). As the member of a death squad, Barth took part in mass murder operations in southern Ukraine, Crimea, and the North Caucasus. He was the first confessed Holocaust perpetrator to be captured by the Allies, and could relate a lot of information on the mass murder of Jews in the southern USSR. However, the British showed only superficial interest in his activities as an accomplice in the mass murders; they were mainly interested in personal data on various leaders of the SD. The British missed an opportunity to acquire intelligence on the Holocaust in the USSR; part of the material of Barth's interrogations are classified up to this day.
    Note: In English and Hebrew.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...