feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Article
    Article
    In:  Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (2023) 21-39
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 21-39
    Keywords: Antisemitism Terminology ; History ; Antisemitism History 1945- ; Antisemitism History
    Abstract: In this chapter I retrace the historical “othering” of the Jews through a discussion of the semantic changes in antisemitic discourse centered on the analysis of the words “Judeophobia,” “Anti-Judaism,” and “antisemitism.” Each term raises the issue of deciding at what point their application becomes an anachronism with respect to the reality they aim to describe or a legitimate extension from their original usage. The semantic discussion provides the framework for recounting the history of anti-Jewish prejudice through a broad interpretative schema that considers legal status as the primary criterion of Jewish inclusion within society, stressing its importance in the interplay between state policies and social practices of inclusion and exclusion in pagan, and subsequently Christian and eventually secularized society. Throughout the study, I emphasize the need to critically challenge the terminological validity of the existing terms with respect to specific historical contexts and phases of anti-Jewish prejudice. What emerges from this approach is that the phenomenon of anti-Jewish hostility comes into being within well-defined and, ab origine, asymmetric relations—economic, religious, political, legal, social, and cultural—whose dynamic is shaped by and articulated through specific tropes. I address, by way of conclusion, the semantic shifts in understandings of antisemitism in the post-1945 period, claiming that the Holocaust and the foundation of the State of Israel transformed the history of the Jews as the history of a minority. This transformed in an irreversible way the discourse on antisemitism, and in doing so provided a new vocabulary for rationalizing anti-Jewish prejudice.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 211-234
    Keywords: International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance ; Antisemitism History 21st century ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Influence ; Arab-Israeli conflict Foreign public opinion, German ; Boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement
    Abstract: This chapter addresses the effects of the German politics of memory and the historical overdetermination of the discourse on antisemitism in the country. German antisemitism discourse builds on an exceptionalist conception of antisemitism as delusional and exterminist, which is derived from the experience of the Holocaust. This conception has proven to be unhelpful in understanding, tackling or fighting contemporary manifestations of antisemitism in all their diversity, varying formative contexts and differing degrees of severity or threat, especially with regard to the overlap between antisemitism and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The current debate on BDS, along with the range of legal and quasi-legal efforts to severely restrict the movement, is symptomatic of this discourse. Rather than conceptualising (and criticising) the movement in all its heterogeneous facets and ideological and practical ambivalences and contradictions, the bulk of the German anti-BDS discourse tends to equate BDS with the Nazi boycott against Jews. The IHRA’s Working Definition of Antisemitism, with its blatant weaknesses, gaps, internal contradictions and political bias, is applied as a helpful tool in these efforts. This chapter outlines the German debate on DBS, including various public scandals and tightening administrative measures tied to Germany’s symbolic anti-antisemitism. In doing so, it highlights trends towards the juridification, securitisation and ‘antifa-isation’ of the discourse on antisemitism and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Article
    Article
    In:  Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (2023) 235-257
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 235-257
    Keywords: Islamophobia Terminology ; History ; Antisemitism Terminology ; History
    Abstract: Islamophobia and antisemitism are two forms of racism that have much in common. The racialisation targets not just a religion or religious group but what is better understood as an ethnoreligious group. The ways that Jews and Muslims oppose such racism increasingly involves the building up of an identity which, like most contemporary equality movements, does not simply reject the one attributed to them by their enemies but a positive replacement. Such positive conceptions can become oppressor identities, as is the case of certain Islamist identities fostered by the likes of Isis or with a Jewish identity centred on Israel. Moreover, the politics of defining these racisms is tied to competition about prioritisation between anti-racisms. This should be based on an empirical evaluation of the scale of the respective racisms (and not on an essentialised hierarchy). Unfortunately, in the case of Islamophobia and antisemitism today, there is a wilful empirical blindness, and the prioritisation is taking place on the basis of which victim group is more influential and has more influential friends. Finally, we must be able to critically talk about groups like Muslims and Jews, about Islam and Israel, without being dismissed as Islamophobes or antisemites. For this to be the case, ‘talk about’ must become ‘talk with’: the character of the criticism must take a dialogical form. I conclude by including a sketch of five tests for distinguishing racialisation from dialogical criticism.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Article
    Article
    In:  Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (2023) 3-18
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 3-18
    Keywords: Antisemitism Terminology ; History ; Islamophobia Terminology ; History
    Abstract: This chapter examines the value and limits of definitions in addressing antisemitism and Islamophobia, two relatively recent terms conveying a lengthy history of animosity and violence. Both terms have been subject in recent decades to controversy over their meaning and function in political and legal efforts to combat the spread of bigoted prejudice in society. We trace the various, constantly shifting, meanings of the two terms and point to the contingent political contexts that propelled these shifts over time. The dynamic nature of definitions, we argue, stems not only from changing views of the phenomena, but also from the fact that definitions perform a rhetorical function, serving at times to discredit political opponents. Drawing on the chapters collected in this volume, we propose three, interrelated, historical trajectories to understand the politics of definition: the long view, which situates the question of definition within a history of political engagements which have aimed to define Jews, Muslims, and the prejudice against them; the short view, focusing on how key events of the twentieth century affected the nature and political role of definitions of racist prejudice in different contexts; and a critical examination of present-day political efforts to advance definition as a purported key to suppress antisemitism and Islamophobia. We argue that the wish to capture the “essence” of antisemitism and Islamophobia without reckoning with the concepts’ historical and political load neither promotes understanding of the phenomena nor does it effectively help to combat them.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Article
    Article
    In:  Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (2023) 89-111
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 89-111
    Keywords: Antisemitism ; Jews Identity ; Group identity ; Jewish nationalism
    Abstract: The word ‘Jew(s)’ has always been a peculiarly potent term whose lability as a concept and category has long rendered it a powerful mechanism for thinking about, constructing, and contesting collectives or collective identities and values in what has come to be called the ‘global West’. Examples of this phenomenon are myriad and are found in seemingly countless forms and variations. Among historical examples are many that clearly partake in acts, attitudes, and images appropriately labeled as ‘anti-Jewish’ or ‘antisemitic’. Other uses are apparently positive or ‘philosemitic’. And still others are enmeshed in neither (or both) of these dynamics as workings of a widespread culture in which Jews, as well as non-Jews, now actively participate in making meaning with and from iconic narratives about Jews. It is this range of complex workings that this chapter explores in order to illuminate significant elements of the current sociopolitical context, in which people of conscience seem unable to reach consensus on definitions and examples of anti-Jewish animus or ‘antisemitism’. In this context, the broad, robust, and inherently plural category Jews has been increasingly circumscribed and merged, in public discourse, with the grammatically definite, singular, and seemingly monolithic phrase ‘the Jewish People’. This particular phrase has a decidedly ethnonationalist pedigree, whose pervasive instrumentalization and institutionalization in the past few decades have substantially undermined Jews’ ability to further pluralistic visions and movements combatting racism and xenophobia in all its forms, including that of antisemitism.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Article
    Article
    In:  Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (2023) 115-136
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 115-136
    Keywords: Cold War ; Arab-Israeli conflict Foreign public opinion, American ; Antisemitism History 1945- ; Israel Foreign relations ; United States Foreign relations ; United States Politics and government 20th century
    Abstract: The Cold War between the USA and the USSR, which lasted from the late 1940s to the late 1980s, bore a contingent relation to the bilateral relations between the US government and the State of Israel, which was established in 1948. Until Richard Nixon became US president in 1969, US leaders often displayed a concern that excessive support for Israel might alienate Arab states and facilitate Soviet ambitions in the Middle East. However, Americans in the political center-left evinced a strong concern to combat antisemitism from the 1940s onward, and this priority consistently underwrote US political support for Israel. Judeophobia declined sharply in American society after 1945, but liberal (in the American meaning) culture retained a powerful determination to expose and combat Jew-hatred, which appeared a leading form of bigotry and a measure of society’s lingering susceptibility to fascist appeals. Those on the center-left saw support for the Jewish state as a moral imperative in this context and were the most passionately pro-Israel figures in American life during this era, especially in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s. After the Middle East War of 1973, some American Jewish organizations began to argue that severe criticism of Israel—over its occupation of territories conquered in 1967, its treatment of the Palestinians, or anything else—was a “new antisemitism.” This implied that support for Israel continued to be the major test of one’s opposition to this form of hatred.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Article
    Article
    In:  Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (2023) 137-163
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 137-163
    Keywords: Authors, Arab Attitudes ; Antisemitism Public opinion ; Jewish nationalism ; Arab nationalism ; Zionism Public opinion ; Arab-Israeli conflict Public opinion ; Islam Relations 20th century ; Judaism
    Abstract: This chapter examines the ways in which Arab writers in the Levant and Egypt addressed the question of modern Antisemitism. It focuses on Arab writers who critiqued Antisemitism and called to distinguish between Zionism and Judaism. I argue that during the Ottoman and interwar periods, new understandings of representative politics generated an interest in how members of different religions, including Jews, come to identify with their imagined national community. In this period, Middle Eastern Jews shaped discussions about Judaism and Islam, as they lived in Muslim empires and Arab nation-states and played a part in their cultures and literatures. Modern interpretations of the role of religion in Arab societies, shaped against the backdrop of European colonialism and its negative assessment of the Muslim faith, likewise inspired new imaginings of the close relationship between Judaism and Islam. The rise of the Zionist movement and the subsequent conflict with the Palestinian national movement, however, raised new ideas about the relationship between Zionism and Antisemitism. Particularly after 1948, Arab writers sought to define how the future Palestinian state would treat its Jewish citizens and debated whom should be considered an indigenous Middle Eastern Jew. A common argument in these circles was that the Palestinians, who were forced to leave their country, making way to Jewish refugees and victims of European persecution, had actually paid the price for European Antisemitism. Paradoxically, then, because the Palestinians perceived themselves as victims of the Jewish Question, in their discussions, the Jewish Question was very much alive and unresolved. Subsequently, Arab writers attempted to establish that Judaism is a religion rather than a nationality and explored what it meant to be a modern Jewish subject, as they investigated the meanings of being a modern Palestinian subject and an exilic Arab intellectual.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Article
    Article
    In:  Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (2023) 165-188
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 165-188
    Keywords: Corbyn, Jeremy ; Philosemitism ; Antisemitism History 1945- ; Anti-Zionism ; Christianity and other religions Judaism 1945- ; History
    Abstract: The defeat of the Labour Party in the 2019 general election in Britain has put to rest the tumultuous “Corbyn Affair” (2015–2019). Whether Labour under Corbyn has been “overrun by anti-Semitism or other forms of racism” or, in the words of the Chakrabarti report, polluted by an “occasionally toxic atmosphere” has been hotly debated. Yet the “affair” above all symbolized the crisis of Europe’s postwar philosemitism: the official repudiation and reprobation of antisemitism in mainstream politics; a shift from enmity to partnership in Christian approaches to Judaism; the rise of a positive image of the Jews as symbol of conservative values or post-national European cosmopolitanism; the duty of Shoah remembrance and official atonement; and despite the rise of virulent anti-Zionism in Europe since 1967, the containment of anti-Israeli criticism within the framework of a two-state solution. Hostility toward Jews, to be sure, never disappeared, but philosemitism broadly conceived has redefined the relationship between contemporary Europe and its Jews. The “Corbyn Affair” challenged the terms of this postwar history: the controversy indeed signaled the possible end of Europe’s postwar philosemitic moment.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Article
    Article
    In:  Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (2023) 191-209
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 191-209
    Keywords: International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance ; Antisemitism Terminology ; History
    Abstract: In May 2016, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) adopted a Working Definition of Antisemitism. The definition has, on the one hand, been widely adopted by national governments, public agencies, local authorities, political parties, and other civil society organizations. It has, on the other hand, been hotly disputed in academic circles and in the public square. In this essay, I evaluate both the text in itself and the uses to which predominantly it is put. I conclude, first, that it does not pass muster as a definition: it is neither clear nor coherent nor sound. Second, not only does it fail to set limits to legitimate speech about Zionism and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, but it lends itself to partisan use by one side in the public debate. I conclude by briefly introducing an alternative document, the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism, which sets out to reclaim the word ‘antisemitism’ and to depoliticize it by lifting it above the fray of the public debate.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    ISBN: 978-3-03-116265-7
    Language: German
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...