feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 211-234
    Keywords: International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance ; Antisemitism History 21st century ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Influence ; Arab-Israeli conflict Foreign public opinion, German ; Boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement
    Abstract: This chapter addresses the effects of the German politics of memory and the historical overdetermination of the discourse on antisemitism in the country. German antisemitism discourse builds on an exceptionalist conception of antisemitism as delusional and exterminist, which is derived from the experience of the Holocaust. This conception has proven to be unhelpful in understanding, tackling or fighting contemporary manifestations of antisemitism in all their diversity, varying formative contexts and differing degrees of severity or threat, especially with regard to the overlap between antisemitism and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The current debate on BDS, along with the range of legal and quasi-legal efforts to severely restrict the movement, is symptomatic of this discourse. Rather than conceptualising (and criticising) the movement in all its heterogeneous facets and ideological and practical ambivalences and contradictions, the bulk of the German anti-BDS discourse tends to equate BDS with the Nazi boycott against Jews. The IHRA’s Working Definition of Antisemitism, with its blatant weaknesses, gaps, internal contradictions and political bias, is applied as a helpful tool in these efforts. This chapter outlines the German debate on DBS, including various public scandals and tightening administrative measures tied to Germany’s symbolic anti-antisemitism. In doing so, it highlights trends towards the juridification, securitisation and ‘antifa-isation’ of the discourse on antisemitism and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Article
    Article
    In:  Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (2023) 191-209
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 191-209
    Keywords: International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance ; Antisemitism Terminology ; History
    Abstract: In May 2016, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) adopted a Working Definition of Antisemitism. The definition has, on the one hand, been widely adopted by national governments, public agencies, local authorities, political parties, and other civil society organizations. It has, on the other hand, been hotly disputed in academic circles and in the public square. In this essay, I evaluate both the text in itself and the uses to which predominantly it is put. I conclude, first, that it does not pass muster as a definition: it is neither clear nor coherent nor sound. Second, not only does it fail to set limits to legitimate speech about Zionism and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, but it lends itself to partisan use by one side in the public debate. I conclude by briefly introducing an alternative document, the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism, which sets out to reclaim the word ‘antisemitism’ and to depoliticize it by lifting it above the fray of the public debate.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...