Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Article
    Article
    Show associated volumes/articles
    In:  Antijudaismus im Neuen Testament? (1967) 95-104
    Language: German
    Year of publication: 1967
    Titel der Quelle: Antijudaismus im Neuen Testament?
    Angaben zur Quelle: (1967) 95-104
    Keywords: Jesus Trial ; New Testament Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Roman law History ; Jewish law ; Christianity and other religions Judaism ; History
    Abstract: Discusses the trial of Jesus in view of Roman law vs. Jewish law. Contends that Jesus was tried, and ultimately convicted and crucified, solely for his having violated Roman law by acts of sedition, claiming to be the king of the Jews, whereas Rome had appointed the Herodian family to that post. Crucifixion was solely a Roman form of execution; Jewish law did not employ crucifixion, not even for crimes which were capital offenses under Jewish law. Therefore, it was not the Jews but the Romans who tried and murdered Jesus.
    Note: Appeared previously in "Das Altertum" 9,3 (1963) 157-164. , Record created automatically from multi-article record # 000282172
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...