Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • French  (4)
  • 2020-2024  (4)
  • Philo, of Alexandria  (4)
  • Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc.  (4)
  • Christianity and other religions Judaism
  • Deutschland
Library
Region
Material
Language
Years
Year
  • 1
    Language: French
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: Religion et rationalité
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 58-83
    Keywords: Philo, Criticism and interpretation ; Philo, ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc., Jewish Post-exilic period, 586 B.C.-210 A.D. ; History
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Article
    Article
    In:  Les études philoniennes; regards sur cinquante ans de recherche (1967-2017) (2021) 286-299
    Language: French
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: Les études philoniennes; regards sur cinquante ans de recherche (1967-2017)
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 286-299
    Keywords: Philo, Criticism and interpretation ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc., Jewish Post-exilic period, 586 B.C.-210 A.D. ; History ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc., Christian Early church, ca. 30-600 ; History ; Fathers of the church
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Language: French
    Year of publication: 2020
    Titel der Quelle: Semitica et Classica; revue internationale d'études orientales et méditerranéennes
    Angaben zur Quelle: 13 (2020) 105-125
    Keywords: Numenius, ; Philo, ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Bible. Versions ; Septuagint ; Influence ; God Philosophy
    Abstract: Philosophe platonicien et pythagoricien du iie siècle, Numénius manifeste une familiarité indéniable avec la tradition judéo-hellénistique. Pour la confirmer, il est coutume d’en appeler au fragment 21 F (fr. 13 dP) de son dialogue Sur le Bien. Là, il aurait employé la formule que Dieu utilise lui-même pour se présenter à Moïse d’après la traduction de la Septante (Ex 3,14a) : ὁ ὤν. Ainsi aurait-il désigné son premier dieu, l’« être par excellence » (τὸ ὄν, τὸ αὐτοόν), comme le font la tradition judéo-hellénistique et plus spécifiquement Philon d’Alexandrie qui nomment Dieu « Celui qui est ». Dans la phrase d’où elle est extraite, cependant, la formule n’a pas ce sens. L’article tente d’en convaincre par une analyse détaillée du fragment et dégage la véritable originalité de Numénius : elle réside dans une réécriture du Timée (41 c - 42 a ; 90 a) et plus spécifiquement de la figure platonicienne du démiurge. Il apparaît alors que le parallèle avec Philon ne peut pas davantage être dressé à partir de la fonction que Numénius attribue dans ce même fragment à son deuxième dieu, auquel il confie la fonction de démiurge proprement dit. Si le rapprochement entre les deux penseurs est possible, il réside avant tout dans leur commune appropriation de Platon. À partir de là, Numénius aurait effectivement pu rencontrer Philon et le compter parmi ces Juifs partageant selon lui l’enseignement du maître (cf. 10 F = fr. 1 dP). Une telle démarche impliquerait seulement que Numénius l’ait parfois convoqué pour illustrer la justesse de ses propres interprétations. Les chrétiens qui le citent n’en donnent toutefois aucune preuve directe et même si cela n’exclut pas de sa part la possibilité d’une inspiration occasionnelle, dans l’état actuel de mes recherches, qui devront être poursuivies, rien ne la prouve, du moins pas dans le fragment 21 F.Numenius, a Platonic and Pythagorean philosopher of the 1st century, shows himself to be undeniably familiar with the Judeo-Hellenistic tradition. As proof, it is usual to refer to the fragment 21 F (fr. 13 dP) of his dialogue “De Bono.” In this text, it seems that he may have used the same formula as in the Bible, in the Septuagint translation (Ex 3:14a), with which God introduces himself to Moses: ὁ ὤν. Numenius thus apparently designated his first God as the “being par excellence” (τὸ ὄν, τὸ αὐτοόν), just as the Judeo-Hellenistic tradition does, and more specifically Philo of Alexandria, who called God “He who is.” However, the biblical meaning is not present in the sentence from which this formula is taken. This paper argues this point by analyzing the fragment and bringing out the true originality of Numenius which consists in rewriting Timæus (41 c - 42 a; 90 a) and more specifically the Platonic figure of the demiurge. It then appears that the parallel with Philo also cannot be drawn from the function that Numenius attributes in this fragment to his second God, to whom he entrusts the proper function of demiurge. If a connection between the two philosophers is possible, it is to be found above all in their shared appropriation of Plato. Numenius could indeed have encountered Philo and counted him among those Jews who, according to him, shared the master’s teaching (cf. 10 F = fr. 1 dP). Such a reasoning would nevertheless imply that Numenius sometimes summoned him in order to illustrate the correctness of his own interpretations. However, the Christian authors who quote him do not give any direct proof of this, and even if this does not exclude the possibility of an occasional inspiration, in the present state of my research, which will have to be continued, there is no evidence of it, at least not in the fragment 21 F.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Article
    Article
    In:  Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques 104,1 (2020) 31-52
    Language: French
    Year of publication: 2020
    Titel der Quelle: Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques
    Angaben zur Quelle: 104,1 (2020) 31-52
    Keywords: Philo, Criticism and interpretation ; Bible Criticism, interpretation, etc., Jewish Post-exilic period, 586 B.C.-210 A.D. ; History ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Philosophy, Ancient
    Abstract: This article attempts to grasp the relationship between exegesis, rhetoric and philosophy in the texts of Philo from a particular angle: the Philonian use of biblical images and the specific role assigned to images in Hellenic thought. If there is in the Alexandrine a reflection on the virtues of language deployed between the exegesis of biblical texts and the constant recourse to theoretical models of philosophy, this reflection explicitly aims to establish a science, rational theology, legitimized by its foundation on the biblical letter and validated at the same time by a specifically philosophical approach and lexicon. However, the practice of images falls within this Philonian attempt to found theological reflection on the relationship of language with the sensitive and intellectual faculties, from the figures and concepts with which philosophical language works to the establishment of a knowledge from the paradigm of the epiphanic virtues with which the biblical letter is provided.
    Note: With an English summary.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...