feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: "Into Life"
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 57-87
    Keywords: Rosenzweig, Franz, ; Jewish philosophy 20th century ; Rationalism Philosophy
    Abstract: The article explores the meaning and role of rationalism within Rosenzweig’s definition of The Star of Redemption as a “new theological Rationalism.” A form-content dualism is presupposed in the Star as the basis for the non-identity of thinking and Being. Significantly, the scientific character of philosophy is for Rosenzweig nothing but its formality, its heterogeneity to its content. Against this background, I argue that Rosenzweig appropriates Hermann Cohen’s transcendental method, which takes rational thinking to be an analysis and a reconstruction of a problematized object — a “fact.” My content is that this method is used in the Star to reenable the thinking of Being (content) from within the metalogical world. It does so by taking Being to be a problematic object, in the notion of God as the objective ground of the world. The philosophically presupposed fact of the Star is thus not Revelation, but the notion of a redeemed world, which emerges as the content of faith. This faith in Redemption represents for Rosenzweig a precondition for Revelation. I finally claim that this is met in prayer, which is the “form where Redemption can become the content of Revelation.”
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: "Into Life"
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 194-215
    Keywords: Cavell, Stanley, Criticism and interpretation ; Rosenzweig, Franz, ; Jewish philosophy 20th century ; Ontology Philosophy ; Aesthetics Philosophy
    Abstract: The essay explores Rosenzweig’s realist ontology in the Metalogic section of the Star of Redemption and brings it into conversation with Stanley Cavell’s realist ontology of film. In each thinker’s realist ontology, the world is thought of as replete with possibilities of being viewed from infinitely many separated but interlocking perspectives. Each thinker places this realist ontology in service of profoundly different aesthetic theories. For Rosenzweig, classical tragedy stages a world where the human is thrown back upon herself and unable to share the world with others. He claims that there is no way for the tragic self to return to the world except through a divine revelation of love that breaks into the closed self and awakens a loving response. Cavell, however, argues that film is the unique modern art form in which classical tragedy and the experience of revelation are combined, where the spectator is separated from the world and also made aware of the possibility of renewing her connection to the world through a loving response that Cavell describes as the “acknowledgment” of the radical otherness of each person.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: "Into Life"
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 111-138
    Keywords: Rosenzweig, Franz, ; Jewish philosophy 20th century ; Creation Philosophy ; Revelation Philosophy ; Art Philosophy
    Abstract: The paper delineates Rosenzweig’s theory of autonomous art against the background of his understanding of metaphysics and systematicity, which evolved around his conception of love. The first part discusses Rosenzweig’s critical understanding of traditional metaphysics and the resulting task of reconfiguring systematic philosophy. The second part reconstructs Rosenzweig’s account of creation as the threshold toward revelation and, thus, as the negative argument for ascribing love such a pivotal role within the overall project of the Star. Part three delineates Rosenzweig’s theory of love as divine calling against the background of both his non-necessitarian yet systematic philosophy and his theory of redemption. The fourth and final part further illuminates Rosenzweig’s theory of love through the juxtaposition between the divine and the artistic calling and/or between revelatory and artistic communication, simultaneously elucidating Rosenzweig’s claim that autonomous art is a necessary yet episodic stage toward religious and religion-inspired social practices.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: "Into Life"
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 139-193
    Keywords: Rosenzweig, Franz, Criticism and interpretation ; Bible Translating ; Philosophy ; Jewish philosophy 20th century ; Art Philosophy 20th century ; History ; Art and religion
    Abstract: According to Siegfried Kracauer the Buber-Rosenzweig Bible translation was an expression of a religious renewal that in an anachronistic and artificial way tried to revive a form of truth that he saw as overcome by the profane reality in modernity. What was for Kracauer merely religious sensationalism was for Rosenzweig an answer to what he saw as the pressing problem of a crisis of orientation in modernity, but also a need to reformulate the relationship between Germanness and Judaism for his own time. Against the background of Kracauer’s critique and the debate that revolves around it, the following essay explores how Rosenzweig formulated an answer in his approach to language and translation and in his theory of art, and thereby shows how he developed his position against what he characterizes as the premises of the idealist tradition. Rosenzweig’s critique was a struggle through what he saw as the contradictions of modernity and the false promise of freedom and autonomy. The essay asks to what extent Rosenzweig entangles himself in the contradictions that he wanted to overcome. Can these contradictions be found in the project of the Bible translation and in Rosenzweig’s work more generally? Can his endeavor be characterized as what Theodor W. Adorno described as a Dialectic of Enlightenment that has been “broken off too early” as a longing for a new form of heteronomy?
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: "Into Life"
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 39-56
    Keywords: Rosenzweig, Franz, ; Judaism History 20th century ; Jews Identity 20th century ; History ; Judaism Philosophy 20th century
    Abstract: In 1921 Rosenzweig made a strong claim for the universalization of his Jewish perspective. Unlike in Weber, Rosenzweig writes, for him Judaism is not the object but the method of his research. This means that it is not only a possible particular religious perspective, but a philosophical way of thought in its own, universally accessible way. The essay discusses this remarkable self-characterization of Rosenzweig’s work in three chapters. The first explores methodological differences between philosophical systems and Rabbinic literature; the second takes a closer look at the process by which the Jewish thinker was “marked” when entering “Jena”; the third tries to make sense of the dialectics in Rosenzweig’s life and philosophy according to which Judaism changed from being a method into becoming a program.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...