feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: "Into Life"
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 39-56
    Keywords: Rosenzweig, Franz, ; Judaism History 20th century ; Jews Identity 20th century ; History ; Judaism Philosophy 20th century
    Abstract: In 1921 Rosenzweig made a strong claim for the universalization of his Jewish perspective. Unlike in Weber, Rosenzweig writes, for him Judaism is not the object but the method of his research. This means that it is not only a possible particular religious perspective, but a philosophical way of thought in its own, universally accessible way. The essay discusses this remarkable self-characterization of Rosenzweig’s work in three chapters. The first explores methodological differences between philosophical systems and Rabbinic literature; the second takes a closer look at the process by which the Jewish thinker was “marked” when entering “Jena”; the third tries to make sense of the dialectics in Rosenzweig’s life and philosophy according to which Judaism changed from being a method into becoming a program.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: "Into Life"
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 139-193
    Keywords: Rosenzweig, Franz, Criticism and interpretation ; Bible Translating ; Philosophy ; Jewish philosophy 20th century ; Art Philosophy 20th century ; History ; Art and religion
    Abstract: According to Siegfried Kracauer the Buber-Rosenzweig Bible translation was an expression of a religious renewal that in an anachronistic and artificial way tried to revive a form of truth that he saw as overcome by the profane reality in modernity. What was for Kracauer merely religious sensationalism was for Rosenzweig an answer to what he saw as the pressing problem of a crisis of orientation in modernity, but also a need to reformulate the relationship between Germanness and Judaism for his own time. Against the background of Kracauer’s critique and the debate that revolves around it, the following essay explores how Rosenzweig formulated an answer in his approach to language and translation and in his theory of art, and thereby shows how he developed his position against what he characterizes as the premises of the idealist tradition. Rosenzweig’s critique was a struggle through what he saw as the contradictions of modernity and the false promise of freedom and autonomy. The essay asks to what extent Rosenzweig entangles himself in the contradictions that he wanted to overcome. Can these contradictions be found in the project of the Bible translation and in Rosenzweig’s work more generally? Can his endeavor be characterized as what Theodor W. Adorno described as a Dialectic of Enlightenment that has been “broken off too early” as a longing for a new form of heteronomy?
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: "Into Life"
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 281-341
    Keywords: Heidegger, Martin, Criticism and interpretation ; Rosenzweig, Franz, Criticism and interpretation ; Jewish philosophy 20th century ; Jews Identity 20th century ; History ; Jews Public opinion 20th century ; History ; Homeland (Theology) ; Antisemitism Philosophy
    Abstract: This essay identifies a surprising, but non the less striking affinity between Heidegger’s later distancing from the National-Socialist geocentrism and Rosenzweig’s affirmation of essentially diasporic character of Jewish existence. The author shows first how Heidegger’s earlier confluence of the ethnolinguistic and the geopolitical results in his distorted critique of the Jewish people, as the ones with no home, language, world, or historical destiny. Though, without exonerating at any rate Heidegger’s distorted and flawed views, the essay proceeds in depicting how Heidegger’s later theological-poetic shift, inspired from and exemplified in Hölderlin’s poetry, shows itself to be highly akin to Rosenzweig’s understanding of Holiness. Asides from his insistence of the special character of the German and the Greek language, Heidegger’s later thinking is characterized by the far-reaching insight regarding the centrality of a poetics that celebrates the sense of the unhomely (das Unheimische) as essential for the possibility for human beings to feel at home (einheimisch) in the world and, hence, by the affirmation of the nomadic nature of poiesis. Heidegger’s turn is analogous to Rosenzweig’s affirmation of the essentiality of the diasporic character of Jewish existence. According to Rosenzweig and to his reading of the tradition, the Holiness of the land and of the language “prevents the eternal people from ever living entirely at one with the times.” A feeling that also applies, according to Rosenzweig, to the way that the Jewish poet perceives his poetic activity and his place in the world. Thus, so the upshot of the essay, despite Heidegger’s denial or ignorance, a deeper convergence between Jewish and the German poiesis can be identified, namely, that the “serenity of being-at-home necessarily belongs together with the turbulence of not-being-at-home.”
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: "Into Life"
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 258-280
    Keywords: Rosenzweig, Franz, Criticism and interpretation ; Jewish philosophers History 20th century ; Jews Identity 20th century ; History
    Abstract: In the face of the collapse of the ideology of the West and world-wide growing populism and fundamentalism, it becomes crucial to take stock of the traditions that have shaped mankind over centuries. One of the main challenges will be the question of tradition and modernity — how to critically use and translate some of the most valuable traditions for the benefit and enrichment of our personal life and of society at large. The study of Franz Rosenzweig “New Thinking” as presented in this essay throws light on this issue, in particular regarding the loss of Jewish tradition in Europe. Rosenzweig’s decision to devote his life to the Freies Jüdisches Lehrhaus in Frankfurt instead of starting an academic career with Friedrich Meinecke in Berlin shows that in the decisive moment of his life Rosenzweig could and did not want to renunciate to his identity as a Jewish bearer of civilisation (Kulturträger) in Europe. Rosenzweig’s “Jewish factuality,” that is, the fact that he philosophized as a Jew, becomes than the philosophical basis for his “New Thinking.”
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...