feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 2020-2024  (10)
  • Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc.  (10)
Library
Region
Material
Language
Years
Year
  • 1
    Article
    Article
    In:  Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 112,1 (2021) 130-140
    Language: French
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft
    Angaben zur Quelle: 112,1 (2021) 130-140
    Keywords: Jesus Crucifixion ; New Testament. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; New Testament. Relation to Psalms ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc.
    Abstract: The intertextual play with Psalm 69:22 in Matt 27:34, 48 is an impor-tant aspect for adequately understanding Matthew’s crucifixion scene. In Matt 27:34 the Roman soldiers offer Jesus “wine mixed with gall”, which is an allusion to Psalm 69:22a. By acting as the praying-self ’s opponents, the Roman soldiers are portrayed as the mockers of Psalm 69:22a. In Matt 27:48, the Jewish authori-ties offer vinegar to the crucified Jesus, which is a clear allusion to Psalm 69:22b. Therefore, the Jewish authorities are portrayed in parallel to the Roman soldiers. Considering that Matthew refers to Psalm 69:22 not in a selective manner, but in the psalm’s context, the parallel between the Roman soldiers and the Jewish authorities extends to the crucial point in Jewish self-conception of being accused of ἀνομία.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: Ben Sira in Conversation with Traditions
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2022) 321-336
    Keywords: Moses In post-biblical literature ; Jesus ; Ecclesiasticus Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; New Testament. Relation to Numbers ; New Testament. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Characters and characteristics
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Journal for the Study of the New Testament
    Angaben zur Quelle: 46,2 (2023) 111-149
    Keywords: Jesus ; Melchisedek Scroll Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; New Testament. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; New Testament. Relation to the Bible ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Messiah in post-biblical literature ; Messiah New Testament teaching ; Son of Man History of doctrines Early church, ca.30-600
    Abstract: This article asks why Jesus in Mk 2.10 interprets the authority (εξουσία γρ) of the Son of Man in Dan. 7.14 as the authority to forgive sins. I approach this question by looking at IIQMelchizedek (11Q13). Drawing on a constellation of texts pertaining to jubilee (Lev. 25, Isa. 61.1, Dan. 9.24-27), 11QMelchizedek portrays Melchizedek as forgiving Israel's sins by his jubilean declaration of 'liberty In light of similar intertextual moves being made in Mark, I suggest that Mk 2.10-'the Son of Man has authority to forgive sins on the land (ἀφιέναι ἁμαρτίας ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς) —invokes the language of the jubilee legislation in Lev. 25.10: 'you will declare forgiveness on the land (διαβοήσετε ἄφεσιν ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς). I conclude that this interpretation of 'authority' in Dan. 7.14 stems from an assumed conflation between the Son of Man of Dan. 7.13-14 with the herald messiah of Isa. 61.1, as well as an interpretation of Isa. 61.1 in which the messiah enacts the eschatological forgiveness of Israel's sins by his jubilean declaration of liberty.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2020
    Titel der Quelle: Novum Testamentum
    Angaben zur Quelle: 62,3 (2020) 229-256
    Keywords: Jesus ; New Testament. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Scapegoat Comparative studies
    Abstract: Behind the cruel mockery of Pilate’s auxiliary troops (Matt 27:27–31), Matthew portrays the royal inauguration of the true cosmic lord. But what has often been missed is that this inauguration also entails Jesus’s cultic elimination as the victim in a performance reminiscent of ancient curse-transmission rituals. Matthew transforms and assimilates the scene to the most famous elimination rite in his Jewish context, the Yom Kippur scapegoat ritual. Jesus becomes a king who himself bears and carries away the moral impurities of the denizens of his own kingdom as the typological fulfillment of the scapegoat of Leviticus 16.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2020
    Titel der Quelle: David, Messianism, and Eschatology
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2020) 219-254
    Keywords: David, Christian interpretations ; Jesus Resurrection ; History of doctrines ; New Testament. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; New Testament Relation to Psalms ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: New Testament Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 67,2 (2021) 284-304
    Keywords: Jesus ; New Testament. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; New Testament. Relation to Psalms ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Sacrifice Biblical teaching ; Sacrifice New Testament teaching
    Abstract: Scholars often argue that Hebrews uses Psalm 40 in Heb 10.5–10 to emphasise obedience, either stressing Christ's lived obedience on earth or suggesting that obedience replaces sacrifice. However, Hebrews does not use Psalm 40 to highlight obedience but to identify another sacrificial offering. Christ's offering is the cultic offering that pleases God and achieves God's salvific will. While God did not take pleasure in Levitical sacrifices, he did command them and promise that they would achieve certain effects. The first covenant sacrifices achieved atonement and forgiveness because they were shadows that anticipated and participated in Christ's offering.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2020
    Titel der Quelle: Journal for the Study of the New Testament
    Angaben zur Quelle: 43,2 (2020) 194-213
    Keywords: Jesus Trial ; New Testament. Relation to the Bible ; New Testament. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc.
    Abstract: Whereas scholars’ methodological assumptions about NT texts’ evocation of Israel’s scripture vary, the plausibility and significance of multivalent allusions need to be examined. The ecce homo statement in the Pilate trial (Jn 19.5) is an apt case for this examination. This study exercises a literary analysis of both proposed allusions – to Zech. 6.12 and 1 Sam. 9.17 – and shows that they are based on a common deeper structure despite the difference in phraseological conformity and historical and literary settings. This deeper structure, functioning like a masterplot, has a simple story form of God’s kingship that consists of his contention with dishonoring hostility and the subsequent building of his temple/dwelling place. This story form, captured in the Song of Moses (Exod. 15) and undergirding the Zechariah sign-act (6.9-15) and Saul’s kingship establishment story (1 Sam. 9), reveals that even in the trial scene Jesus is paradoxically enthroned and building the eschatological temple.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: Journal of Biblical Literature
    Angaben zur Quelle: 141,3 (2022) 513-531
    Keywords: Jesus ; New Testament. Relation to Psalms ; New Testament. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc.
    Abstract: Many interpreters hold that Jesus’s response to the high priest (Mark 14:62), combining Ps 110:1 and Dan 7:13, refers to his imminent heavenly enthronement and says nothing of his future return. Many others recognize a reference to Jesus’s parousia but see this solely in the allusion to Dan 7:13 (“coming with the clouds”), rather than in anything drawn from Ps 110. In contrast to these views, we argue that Ps 110 provides a key to understanding Jesus’s eschatological vision in Mark. The psalm envisages a chronological distinction between the enthronement of David’s lord “at the right hand” and his eschatological victory in the world. Mark’s Jesus also, in his response to the high priest, envisages his future career in two distinct stages that mirror those set forth in the psalm: first, his enthronement at God’s “right hand,” and then his final advent from heaven as the glorious Son of Man. This reading is consistent with Jesus’s teaching elsewhere in Mark, which envisages a period of bodily absence before his final return. It is supported by other early Christian texts in which the chronological progression in the psalm provides scriptural warrant for a distinction between Jesus’s present heavenly enthronement and future return.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Article
    Article
    In:  Journal of Biblical Literature 142,3 (2023) 493-512
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Journal of Biblical Literature
    Angaben zur Quelle: 142,3 (2023) 493-512
    Keywords: Jesus Person and offices ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Bible. Versions ; Septuagint ; New Testament. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; New Testament. Relation to the Bible
    Abstract: Markan interpreters have long observed that the words of the voice from heaven at Jesus's baptism in Mark 1:11, "You are my beloved son, in you I am well pleased," recall one or more passages from the LXX, most often Ps 2:7 and Isa 42:1. Yet few interpreters note that Mark 1:11 also bears remarkable similarity to another verse—Jer 38:20 LXX (31:20 MT)—in which God calls Israel his "beloved son." On closer inspection, there are reasons to believe that Mark alludes to this verse as well as to Ps 2:7 and Isa 42:1. In addition to the fact that Israel is the only entity known as God's "beloved son" in ancient Jewish literature outside the New Testament, Mark's prologue and Jer 38 are united by a common remembrance of Israel's exodus and the expectation of a new one. If this reading is correct, then Mark simultaneously identifies Jesus as God's royal son and the embodiment of God's original son, Israel, in one breath.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Article
    Article
    In:  Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman Period 53,3 (2023) 405-436
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman Period
    Angaben zur Quelle: 53,3 (2023) 405-436
    Keywords: Jesus Person and offices ; History of doctrines ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Monotheism ; Judaism Doctrines ; Judaism Relations Early church, ca. 30-600 ; Christianity ; Rabbinical literature History and criticism
    Abstract: This article furthers our understanding of rabbinic theology through an examination of its characteristic modes of expression. I demonstrate that although the rabbinic literature frequently polemicizes against perceived deviant theologies, it refrains from explicit expressions of God’s unity. This disinclination derives from the target and intent of rabbinic theological polemic. The rabbis’ opponents were not Christian binitarians who believed in multiple divine persons, but what I will refer to as Jewish subordinationists who believed in created divine agents through which God acts in the world. The rabbis were therefore less concerned with the ontological nature of God’s unity than they were with distancing all other beings from God’s sole sovereignty. My work provides additional textual support for the growing scholarly consensus that Jewish proponents of Logos theologies were among the rabbis’ earliest opponents, but it challenges the current convention that interprets these theologies in a primarily Christian binitarian context.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...