feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Article
    Article
    In:  Semitica et Classica; revue internationale d'études orientales et méditerranéennes 10 (2017) 81-93
    Language: French
    Year of publication: 2017
    Titel der Quelle: Semitica et Classica; revue internationale d'études orientales et méditerranéennes
    Angaben zur Quelle: 10 (2017) 81-93
    Keywords: Philo, Bibliography ; Bible Commentaries ; History and criticism ; Jews Identity ; History ; Jews Identity ; Rome Relations
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Article
    Article
    In:  Semitica et Classica; revue internationale d'études orientales et méditerranéennes 10 (2017) 111-121
    Language: French
    Year of publication: 2017
    Titel der Quelle: Semitica et Classica; revue internationale d'études orientales et méditerranéennes
    Angaben zur Quelle: 10 (2017) 111-121
    Keywords: Bible. Criticism, Textual ; Manuscripts, Samaritan
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Article
    Article
    In:  Semitica et Classica; revue internationale d'études orientales et méditerranéennes 15 (2022) 247-260
    Language: French
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: Semitica et Classica; revue internationale d'études orientales et méditerranéennes
    Angaben zur Quelle: 15 (2022) 247-260
    Keywords: Bible. Versions ; Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia ; Bible. Versions ; Biblia Hebraica quinta ; Bible Publication and distribution ; Bible Criticism, Textual ; Masorah
    Abstract: For some years now, the new project of Biblia hebraica quinta (BHQ) has produced its first volumes. Up until 2022, eight volumes have been published: Genesis, Leviticus, Deuteronomy, Judges, the Twelve Prophets, Proverbs, the Five Megilloth (the Song of Solomon, Ruth, Qohelet, Lamentations, and Esther), and Ezra-Nehemiah. This new edition of the Biblia hebraica series continues to use the Leningrad Manuscript B 19a as its base text. Compared to Biblia hebraica stuttgartensia (BHS), BHQ is distinguished by a/ a better reading of the manuscript where it is less legible, b/ the presentation, translation, and commentary on the Masorah, c/ an apparatus criticus in English which reflects recent research, in particular on the Dead Sea scrolls and other textual witnesses, d/characterizations of variant readings, e/ notes and commentaries on the Masorah and the critical apparatus. The comparison with BHS emphasizes what is new in BHQ.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Language: French
    Year of publication: 2020
    Titel der Quelle: Semitica et Classica; revue internationale d'études orientales et méditerranéennes
    Angaben zur Quelle: 13 (2020) 105-125
    Keywords: Numenius, ; Philo, ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Bible. Versions ; Septuagint ; Influence ; God Philosophy
    Abstract: Philosophe platonicien et pythagoricien du iie siècle, Numénius manifeste une familiarité indéniable avec la tradition judéo-hellénistique. Pour la confirmer, il est coutume d’en appeler au fragment 21 F (fr. 13 dP) de son dialogue Sur le Bien. Là, il aurait employé la formule que Dieu utilise lui-même pour se présenter à Moïse d’après la traduction de la Septante (Ex 3,14a) : ὁ ὤν. Ainsi aurait-il désigné son premier dieu, l’« être par excellence » (τὸ ὄν, τὸ αὐτοόν), comme le font la tradition judéo-hellénistique et plus spécifiquement Philon d’Alexandrie qui nomment Dieu « Celui qui est ». Dans la phrase d’où elle est extraite, cependant, la formule n’a pas ce sens. L’article tente d’en convaincre par une analyse détaillée du fragment et dégage la véritable originalité de Numénius : elle réside dans une réécriture du Timée (41 c - 42 a ; 90 a) et plus spécifiquement de la figure platonicienne du démiurge. Il apparaît alors que le parallèle avec Philon ne peut pas davantage être dressé à partir de la fonction que Numénius attribue dans ce même fragment à son deuxième dieu, auquel il confie la fonction de démiurge proprement dit. Si le rapprochement entre les deux penseurs est possible, il réside avant tout dans leur commune appropriation de Platon. À partir de là, Numénius aurait effectivement pu rencontrer Philon et le compter parmi ces Juifs partageant selon lui l’enseignement du maître (cf. 10 F = fr. 1 dP). Une telle démarche impliquerait seulement que Numénius l’ait parfois convoqué pour illustrer la justesse de ses propres interprétations. Les chrétiens qui le citent n’en donnent toutefois aucune preuve directe et même si cela n’exclut pas de sa part la possibilité d’une inspiration occasionnelle, dans l’état actuel de mes recherches, qui devront être poursuivies, rien ne la prouve, du moins pas dans le fragment 21 F.Numenius, a Platonic and Pythagorean philosopher of the 1st century, shows himself to be undeniably familiar with the Judeo-Hellenistic tradition. As proof, it is usual to refer to the fragment 21 F (fr. 13 dP) of his dialogue “De Bono.” In this text, it seems that he may have used the same formula as in the Bible, in the Septuagint translation (Ex 3:14a), with which God introduces himself to Moses: ὁ ὤν. Numenius thus apparently designated his first God as the “being par excellence” (τὸ ὄν, τὸ αὐτοόν), just as the Judeo-Hellenistic tradition does, and more specifically Philo of Alexandria, who called God “He who is.” However, the biblical meaning is not present in the sentence from which this formula is taken. This paper argues this point by analyzing the fragment and bringing out the true originality of Numenius which consists in rewriting Timæus (41 c - 42 a; 90 a) and more specifically the Platonic figure of the demiurge. It then appears that the parallel with Philo also cannot be drawn from the function that Numenius attributes in this fragment to his second God, to whom he entrusts the proper function of demiurge. If a connection between the two philosophers is possible, it is to be found above all in their shared appropriation of Plato. Numenius could indeed have encountered Philo and counted him among those Jews who, according to him, shared the master’s teaching (cf. 10 F = fr. 1 dP). Such a reasoning would nevertheless imply that Numenius sometimes summoned him in order to illustrate the correctness of his own interpretations. However, the Christian authors who quote him do not give any direct proof of this, and even if this does not exclude the possibility of an occasional inspiration, in the present state of my research, which will have to be continued, there is no evidence of it, at least not in the fragment 21 F.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...