feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: "Into Life"
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 240-257
    Keywords: Rosenzweig, Franz, Criticism and interpretation ; Jewish philosophers History 20th century ; War (Philosophy) ; Globalization Philosophy
    Abstract: The essay constitutes a contribution to Franz Rosenzweig’s intellectual biography, which continues to be too conditioned by Nahum N. Glatzer’s book Franz Rosenzweig: His Life and Thought (1953). It aims to establish a connection between Hegel and the State (1914) and The Star of Redemption (1921) by means of Rosenzweig’s Writings on War (1917) and against the usual division of Rosenzweig’s intellectual development into two irreconcilable blocks, which is based precisely on Glatzer’s account of his life. Thus, I call into question the separation between Rosenzweig as the German historian and Friedrich Meinecke’s disciple on the one hand, and Rosenzweig as the Jewish philosopher and practicing Jew on the other. To this end, the essay provides Rosenzweig’s geopolitical interpretation of the first world war as the beginning of a process of globalization. Taking as starting point Rosenzweig’s critique of Bismarck’s Realpolitik, this process is expounded as the Christian path towards redemption and it is compared to Carl Schmitt’s Großraum theory. Lastly, Rosenzweig’s solution to Marcion’s Gnosticism, namely his relational conception of Judaism and Christianity as mutually dependent redemptive agents, is briefly described.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: "Into Life"
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 139-193
    Keywords: Rosenzweig, Franz, Criticism and interpretation ; Bible Translating ; Philosophy ; Jewish philosophy 20th century ; Art Philosophy 20th century ; History ; Art and religion
    Abstract: According to Siegfried Kracauer the Buber-Rosenzweig Bible translation was an expression of a religious renewal that in an anachronistic and artificial way tried to revive a form of truth that he saw as overcome by the profane reality in modernity. What was for Kracauer merely religious sensationalism was for Rosenzweig an answer to what he saw as the pressing problem of a crisis of orientation in modernity, but also a need to reformulate the relationship between Germanness and Judaism for his own time. Against the background of Kracauer’s critique and the debate that revolves around it, the following essay explores how Rosenzweig formulated an answer in his approach to language and translation and in his theory of art, and thereby shows how he developed his position against what he characterizes as the premises of the idealist tradition. Rosenzweig’s critique was a struggle through what he saw as the contradictions of modernity and the false promise of freedom and autonomy. The essay asks to what extent Rosenzweig entangles himself in the contradictions that he wanted to overcome. Can these contradictions be found in the project of the Bible translation and in Rosenzweig’s work more generally? Can his endeavor be characterized as what Theodor W. Adorno described as a Dialectic of Enlightenment that has been “broken off too early” as a longing for a new form of heteronomy?
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...