feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Material
Language
  • 1
    Article
    Article
    In:  Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient (2021) 1-33
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 1-33
    Keywords: Voegelin, Eric, ; Bible History of Biblical events ; Cosmology ; History Philosophy
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Article
    Article
    In:  Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient (2021) 301-317
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 301-317
    Keywords: Voegelin, Eric, ; Voegelin, Eric, Criticism and interpretation ; Bible Criticism, interpretation, etc., Christian ; Judaism (Christian theology) History of doctrines 20th century ; Christianity and other religions Judaism 20th century ; History
    Abstract: 1944 Eric Voegelin wrote to Leo Strauss that the world of medieval Jewish interpretation of the Bible was a foreign world for him. In 1956, in his Israel and Revelation, he still does not mention any Jewish interpretation of what he calls the Old Testament. My points: 1. What does relying on Old Testament science, a science that does not include rabbinic literature when reading the Scriptures, mean? Eric Voegelin argues that the development of this Testament belongs to the Prophets and to the Gospel as though a post biblical Jewish tradition was illegitimate. He argues that his view is “objective” yet it is also a very traditional Christian one: the potentialities of the compact Jewish symbols were discovered by Christian people not by the Jews. 2. The liberation from the bondage in Egypt under the guidance of Moses: Voegelin describes him as a man who prefigured the Son of God. But he is not yet a real person as Jesus will be. He describes this story as a drama of the soul and as a liberation from Sheol. Yet it was a failure because Israel wanted to reach the Promised Land although the Kingdom of God is not of this world. All along these pages Voegelin describes the Jewish People in a very negative way: the Jews and Moses were prisoners of a collective symbol and had not discovered the individual personality. He who argues otherwise distorts the “real meaning” of the text. 3. From the point of view of world history the Old Testament is both an epochal event (Revelation) and a failure in spite of the Prophets. Therefore Israel had to disappear as such, it had to undergo an Exodus from itself. Now what does “foreign” mean in the quotation I mentioned above? It refers to what is foreign to the reality of true Redemption. Conclusion: Christian universality versus human universality.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Language: German
    Year of publication: 2019
    Titel der Quelle: Gott denken
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2019) 167-180
    Keywords: Voegelin, Eric, ; History Religious aspects ; History of doctrines ; History Religious aspects ; Judaism ; God Biblical teaching ; God (Judaism) History of doctrines
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Article
    Article
    In:  Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient (2021) 193–222
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 193–222
    Keywords: Voegelin, Eric, Criticism and interpretation ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Monotheism Biblical teaching ; Monotheism History ; Jewish law Biblical teaching
    Abstract: Starting from Eric Voegelin’s view of the decisive importance of Deuteronomy in the development from Israelite to Early Jewish religion, I shall concentrate on an issue that has been vibrantly discussed in Hebrew Bible scholarship since Voegelin’s times: the emergence of monotheism. In recent decades we have become aware that monotheism does not predate exilic times, that is, the sixth century BCE. The decisive texts in the Hebrew Bible that explicitely negate the existence of other gods besides Yhwh, thus pointing the way to ‘monotheistic’ thought, are found in Deuteronomy (cf. especially 4:35, 39) and in Deutero-Isaiah. This paper will focus on the interplay between this idea and the conception of divine law in Deuteronomy, suggesting that the ultimate authorization of divine law by negating the existence of other gods may have been one of the motivating factors in the emergence of monotheism. If this is the case, Deuteronomy’s role in the history of monotheistic religions may be even more decisive than Voegelin thought.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Article
    Article
    In:  Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 40 [157] (2010) 9-22
    Language: German
    Year of publication: 2010
    Titel der Quelle: Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik
    Angaben zur Quelle: 40 [157] (2010) 9-22
    Keywords: Voegelin, Eric, ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Influence ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Historiography ; National socialism Philosophy ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945)
    Abstract: Describes, briefly, the two most significant debates on the Holocaust in the past decades: the German "Historikerstreit" (1986-87) and the debate surrounding Daniel Goldhagen's book "Hitler's Willing Executioners" (1996). Contends that the fanatical antisemitism of Hitler and his cohorts, and their intention to murder the Jews, can be explained in accordance with the theory of "political religion", explicated by Eric Voegelin and others. Hitler and other leading Nazis cherished an apocalyptic worldview, which must be seen as the most poignant manifestation of Nazism's political religion and as the only plausible explanation of the Holocaust.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Article
    Article
    In:  Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient (2021) 263–278
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 263–278
    Keywords: Voegelin, Eric, ; Voegelin, Eric, Criticism and interpretation ; Bible Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; God Biblical teaching
    Abstract: This paper raises a number of critical questions concerning Eric Voegelin’s work, Israel and Revelation. First, does Voegelin’s vision that the kingdom of G-d entail the dissolution of national, racial, and ethnic groups, most notably the Jewish people, provide a basis for a peaceful and viable world order? Or does it in fact give expression to Christian supersessionism that does not tolerate different or competing world views and therefore calls for their suppression and destruction? Second, writing in the immediate aftermath of the Shoah, his work does not address the fundamental questions of divine righteousness, i.e., is G-d truly omnipotent, omnipresent, engaged, and just in dealing with human beings? Apart from his model of submission, do human beings bear responsibility for bringing order into the world in which we live? Third, Voegelin misjudges the character of the literary sources found in the Hebrew Bible, insofar as he simplistically presupposes that biblical literature is too closely identified with the events that it portrays. Such a perspective prevents him from understanding how biblical literature portrays and interprets events to serve as a basis from which later generations of readers, such as Judaism and Christianity, might learn and construct their own understandings of the world and of G-d. Fourth, to what degree does Voegelin artificially choose elements of biblical literature, such as the prophetic books of Isaiah and Jeremiah, that support his understanding of G-d and history, and ignore those that do not, such as Ezekiel and the Book of the Twelve Prophets, that present very different understandings of ideal human and divine interrelationships? Furthermore, to what extent does he selectively read elements of the Book of Isaiah that support his understanding, prompting him to misunderstand the book? Finally, to what degree does he misunderstand Judaism, particularly its concept of the chosen people, thereby ignoring Judaism’s view that nations can and should live together in peace in keeping with the laws of Noah? The balance of the paper addresses each of these questions.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Article
    Article
    In:  Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient (2021) 233–260
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 233–260
    Keywords: Voegelin, Eric, Criticism and interpretation ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc., Christian ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc., Christian ; Servant of Jehovah Biblical teaching
    Abstract: The role that the prophets play in the divine design is marked by the decay of the historical order under God that Israel was experiencing as the protagonist of the leap in being and, therefore, as the chosen people. That order, now threatened, was destined to be the order of all nations. The unfaithfulness of Israel to the covenant leads it toward disaster and disappearance. But then, how will the new order reach the rest of the peoples? It is then that what Voegelin calls the “exodus of Israel from itself” begins, an apt expression that captures the movement that goes from Israel, the chosen people, to the prophet and from the prophet to the servant of Yahweh who, as the last representative of Israel, will take salvation to all nations. Isaiah and Jeremiah are the two great prophets in whom the first step of this transition takes place. In the very experience of these prophets, the order and the faithfulness of Israel to the covenant are preserved. At the same time, new symbolizations flow from their lips which are destined to define the outlines of the future historical form of the present under God. The transition from the prophet Jeremiah to Deutero-Isaiah, the first incarnation of the suffering servant of Yahweh, marks the final stage of this exodus. The servant is the representative of Israel to take salvation to the nations, although his work will remain incomplete in his lifetime. Second Isaiah introduces a new typos into the history of order, a typos that other successors of the prophet will incarnate until the work is carried to its fulfillment. The task of the servant inaugurates the third stage of world history: the creation of salvation. In it, Yahweh will show himself as the God of all nations.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Article
    Article
    In:  Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient (2021) 279–299
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 279–299
    Keywords: Voegelin, Eric, ; Voegelin, Eric, Criticism and interpretation ; Bible Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; History Philosophy
    Abstract: One of the great challenges in dealing with a text is to address the event or events that cannot be included within it. Nowhere is this more crucial than when the text turns on the revelation of the transcendent, that which transcends not just the text but all that is. Voegelin was familiar with this problem and developed a sophisticated philosophical perspective that allowed him to navigate the perennial complications of biblical literary criticism. In particular, he understood that this was not merely a challenge for readers of sacred texts, but a pivotal issue in comprehending the emergence of history as the framework within which we locate the events of history. Where in history is history itself properly located? The perspective that includes all perspectives, it would seem, is not a perspective. My essay will be a rereading of Israel and Revelation in light of such questions.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 223–232
    Keywords: Voegelin, Eric, Criticism and interpretation ; Weber, Max, Criticism and interpretation ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Politics in the Bible
    Abstract: The lecture on Eric Voegelin’s Order and History I. Israel and the Revelation compares it with Max Weber’s Ancient Judaism in his Economic Ethics of the World Religions, which Eric Voegelin used intensively for his Order and History. Starting point for this comparative interpretation of the two approaches will be Eric Voegelin’s lecture “Die Größe Max Webers,” which he gave on the Max Weber centennial 1964 in Munich. The two methodologies to interpret the early Jewish culture and religion in the Hebrew Bible will be evaluated and Eric Voegelin’s pleading for a political science beyond Max Weber discussed.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 73–118
    Keywords: Moses ; Albright, William Foxwell, ; Voegelin, Eric, ; Voegelin, Eric, Criticism and interpretation ; Bible Historiography
    Abstract: The publication of Eric Voegelin’s Israel and Revelation in 1956 brought a wide range of reactions. Not only immediate colleagues in political science, but philosophers, theologians, and specialists in biblical studies and the ancient Near East produced reviews of the book in the following years. Arguably the most prominent among the latter specialists was the American William Foxwell Albright of the Johns Hopkins University. Like Vogelin, he was internationally renown, in his case for a strikingly diverse body of foundational studies in the history, archaeology, languages, texts, and religions of the ancient Near East. His extensive review of Israel and Revelation and part of the succeeding volume in Voegelin’s series, The World of the Polis, appeared in 1961 in the journal, Theological Studies, and Albright considered the review important enough in his own prolific scholarship to be reprinted in a volume of some of his opera minora of 1964, History, Archaeology, and Christian Humanism. This paper will look at Voegelin’s Israel and Revelation through Albright’s eyes, and Albright’s work of a similar kind, principally his From the Stone Age to Christianity (1940 with subsequent editions through 1957), through Voegelin’s. Both scholars, as we will see, attempted to write “big history”—history in a large framework, though from rather different perspectives and foci. One question that emerges: were their histories and their approaches to history contradictory or complementary?
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...