feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Article
    Article
    In:  Textus 28 (2019) 45-66
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2019
    Titel der Quelle: Textus
    Angaben zur Quelle: 28 (2019) 45-66
    Keywords: Bible. Criticism, Textual ; Bible. Criticism, Textual ; Bible. Versions ; Dead Sea scrolls
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Article
    Article
    In:  Journal of Biblical Literature 142,4 (2023) 567-588
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Journal of Biblical Literature
    Angaben zur Quelle: 142,4 (2023) 567-588
    Keywords: Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Bible. Criticism, Redaction ; Deuteronomistic history (Biblical criticism)
    Abstract: In recent years, biblicists have argued that the "judge of Israel" and the "era of judges" are simply the editorial invention of the Deuteronomist(s). Central to the debate is the place of Judg 2:11–19, the only passage within the book of Judges where the leaders of early Israel are specifically designated with the Hebrew title [inline-graphic 01], conventionally translated "judge." Since, according to recent scholarship, [inline-graphic 02] never existed in Israel's premonarchic past, their biblical attestation in Judg 2:11–19 demands an explanation. Over the past several decades, scholars have offered various ideas, none of which has been fully satisfactory. In this article, I challenge prevailing claims about the [inline-graphic 03] of premonarchic Israel through a reexamination of the composition history of Judg 2:11–19. I argue that this literary unit underwent two phases of editing—one in Israelite circles, and another in Judahite (Deuteronomistic) circles. Behind these editorial layers of Judg 2:11–19 is what I propose may have been a substratum on which later editors built. Notwithstanding the hypothetical nature of this substratum, I show how it corresponds to certain sociopolitical realities that would have been foreign at later times of writing and how it coheres with recent models of composition history for the book of Judges. Thus, I argue that the [inline-graphic 04] of Israel was not the invention of the Deuteronomist(s). Moreover, the findings suggest that Judg 2:11–19 may preserve a genuine memory of [inline-graphic 05] in premonarchic Israel. While recent scholarship has sought to explain cultural phenomena of early Israel (e.g., the [inline-graphic 06]) as the product of later writings, my study invites a discussion of possible links with older cultural settings.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: Vetus Testamentum
    Angaben zur Quelle: 72,3 (2022) 386-403
    Keywords: Nebuchadnezzar ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Bible. Criticism, Redaction
    Abstract: During the second half of the first millennium BCE, innovative portrayals of Nebuchadnezzar began to emerge within Jewish circles that reshaped and reimagined his role in their history. Such reconstruals were part and parcel of the lively negotiations among Babylonian and Hellenistic scribes over the representation of bygone Mesopotamian monarchs. In this essay, I examine the reimagination of Nebuchadnezzar in the court tales of Dan 2–6 as a unique example of how scribes sought to reshape the haunting memory of Nebuchadnezzar. By comparing Nebuchadnezzar’s narrative portrait with various texts from Jewish prophetic traditions, I argue that the redactor of the court tales constructed a counter-memory of Nebuchadnezzar in which the traumatic experience of Judah’s humiliation, deportation, and restoration was creatively mapped onto Nebuchadnezzar. In order to construct this counter-memory, the redactor drew upon and repurposed specific language, imagery, and motifs borrowed from these textual traditions.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...