feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Supraregional  (2)
  • Johnson, Carter  (1)
  • צ'פקובה, קתרינה  (1)
  • 1
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2011
    Titel der Quelle: World Politics
    Angaben zur Quelle: 63,1 (2011) 1-42
    Keywords: Antisemitism History 1800-2000 ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) ; Jews ; Jews
    Abstract: Argues that the principal impact on the wartime behavior of Romanians toward Jews was exerted by the prewar policies of the respective governments toward ethnic minorities, rather than by the ethnic composition of the majority populations and their traditional attitudes toward Jews, resentment against the Soviet regime, opportunism, and other factors. Compares the wartime behaviors, both of conflict and of cooperation, vis-à-vis the Jews in the two similar territories, Bessarabia and Transnistria, both occupied by the Romanian Army. Both had been parts of antisemitic Tsarist Russia in 1812-1918, but in 1919-40 Bessarabia was part of Romania, with its intense official nationalism and antisemitism, while Transnistria was part of the USSR, which was strongly committed to integrating the Jews and severely punished antisemitism. Examines postwar survivors' accounts, police reports, etc., as well as the results of a mail survey conducted by Dumitru among survivors. The examined materials clearly show that the attitude and behavior of the Transnistrian, mainly Ukrainian population toward the Jews was much more friendly than those of the Bessarabian, mainly Romanian (Moldovan) population. The behavior of the latter is characterized by a high level of anti-Jewish violence. Without suggesting that antisemitism was defeated in Soviet-ruled Ukraine, including Transnistria, argues that governmental policies had a strong effect on wartime non-Jewish attitudes toward the Jews.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Journal of Modern History
    Angaben zur Quelle: 95,4 (2023) 847-886
    Keywords: Slánský, Rudolf Trials, litigation, etc. ; Antisemitism History 1945- ; Jewish communists ; Trials (Political crimes and offenses) ; Jews History 1945-
    Abstract: In November 1952, former General Secretary of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia Rudolf Slánský and thirteen other prominent Communist Party leaders underwent a widely publicized political trial. Slánský featured as the alleged ringleader of a conspiracy of “Trotskyist-Titoist Zionists, bourgeois-nationalist traitors” working on behalf of “American imperialists.” Following the trial, eleven of the fourteen defendants, among them Slánský, were hanged and the ashes of their bodies strewn along a road leading out of Prague. The remaining three received life sentences. Eleven of the original fourteen defendants, the prosecutor declared, were “of Jewish origin.” Up to now, the surprisingly sparse scholarship on the Slánský trial has argued that Slánský’s November 1951 arrest, as well as the antisemitic tone of the trial, were engineered primarily by Soviet advisors and Joseph Stalin himself. This article, which draws upon previously ignored archival materials in the former Soviet Union and a fresh, post–Cold War reading of archival materials in today’s Czech Republic, argues instead that local dynamics within the Czechoslovak Communist Party were paramount. Specifically, it focuses on how and why Czechoslovak Communist members denounced one another to Soviet officials, and how these denunciations laid the groundwork for Slánský’s downfall while breaking the previous taboo within the party on antisemitic rhetoric. It thus reveals much about the nature of the Czechoslovak-Soviet relationship, as well as relationships between other countries of Communist Eastern Europe and Moscow, before Stalin’s death in 1953—relationships that were not as one-sided as many scholars and others beyond academia often assume.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...