Language:
English
Year of publication:
2021
Titel der Quelle:
Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum
Angaben zur Quelle:
25,2 (2021) 284-319
Keywords:
Julian,
;
Cyril,
;
Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc.
;
Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc.
;
Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc., Christian Early church, ca. 30-600
;
History
;
Bible. Criticism, Textual
;
Son of God History of doctrines Early church, ca. 30-600
;
Transmission of texts
Abstract:
The biblical argument plays a considerable role in Julian’s controversy against Christianity and has certainly contributed to the “invincible efficiency” of his work, as pointed out by his adversary Cyril of Alexandria. This paper focuses on two verses Gen 49:10 and Gen 6:2 invoked by Julian to prove that Moses has never spoken, either of the coming of Jesus, or of an Only-Begotten Son of God, and consequently that Christians are unfaithful to Moses. The specificity of this debate is that it concerns not only the interpretation of these verses, but the very form of the biblical text, its possible falsification or the existence of marginalia. In this second case, Cyril’s refutation in his Contra Julianum, as well as parallels in other Cyrillian works, helps to understand that Julian is referring to a biblical paratext, a rare element that enhances his reputation as a good connoisseur of the exegetical debates of his time, and provides a particularly interesting testimony about the material transmission of the biblical text.
DOI:
10.1515/zac-2021-0030
URL:
Locate this publication in Israeli libraries
Permalink