Language:
English
Year of publication:
2021
Titel der Quelle:
Levinas Studies
Angaben zur Quelle:
15 (2021) 175-202
Keywords:
Lévinas, Emmanuel
;
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich,
;
Other (Philosophy)
Abstract:
Neither according to Hegel nor according to Levinas is it possible to define the person independently of collectivity. For both, dialogues play a strategic role in the orientation towards the collective. For Hegel, the "good conscience" is significant because it is a reference for describing the assumptions, and the results of a dialogue. I describe these implications in my first section. In the second section, I present Levinas's objections to the "good conscience." Instead of a "good conscience," for Levinas, conscience is an instance that does not confirm the subject but accuses it. In the third section, I explore Levinas's understanding of dialogue. In his view, dialogue resists a "priority of knowledge" and has an antecedence that points to the common origin of language and ethics. In my conclusion, I describe the resulting intersections and breaks and how a dialogue between Hegel and Levinas can be established against this background.
URL:
Locate this publication in Israeli libraries