Abstract
This essay compares Martin Buber’s “Legende des Baalschem,” a modern retelling of tales about the founder of Hasidism, with Nietzsche’s philosophical novel “Also sprach Zarathustra.” While scholarship to date has focused on Nietzsche’s ideas in Buber’s essays, this analysis examines both texts as literary expressions. I argue that the narratives seek to replace conventional morality with new ethical imperatives, imperatives written in the literary guise of religious prophets, but paradoxically with a predominantly secular orientation. In “Also sprach Zarathustra,” Nietzsche posits a radical form of immanence that seeks to strengthen individuality, while Buber constructs a form of Jewish identity that not only affirms immanence and individual autonomy but also integrates these values into an idealized community. In terms of character, both Zarathustra and the Baalschem are similarly constructed as sovereign, creative leaders with disciples but differ in that Zarathustra becomes increasingly inner focused while the Baalschem uses mystical interiority as a tool for active participation in the Hasidic community. Thematically, both texts operate with a similar psychology of revenge as a central motive for human behavior but also confront the problem of affirming existence in immanent reality. Zarathustra affirms immanence through an ecstatic process of reconciliation with self and life, but only at the price of alienation from society. Buber’s “Legende” also upholds an autonomous self who finds joy in life, but the Hasidic mystic furthermore creates bonds with a transcendent power and within his faith community.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aschheim, S. (1992). The Nietzsche legacy in Germany: 1890–1990. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ben-Amos, D., & Mintz, J. R. (Eds.). (1970). In praise of Baal Schem Tov [Shivhei ha-Besht]: The earliest collection of legends about the founder of Hasidism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Buber, M. (1908). Legende des Baalschem. Frankfurt: Rütten & Loening.
Friedman, M. (1981). Martin Buber’s life and work. The early years 1878–1923. New York: Elsevier.
Golumb, J. (2004). Nietzsche and Zion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Gooding-Williams, R. (2002). Zarathustra’s dionysian modernism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Grözinger, K. E. (Ed.). (1997). Die geschichten vom Ba’al Schem Tov. Schivhe ha-Besht. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Higgins, K. M. (1987). Nietzsche’s Zarathustra. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Lampert, L. (1986). Nietzsche’s teaching: An interpretation of Thus spoke Zarathustra. New Haven: Yale UP.
Mendes-Flohr, P. (1989). From mysticism to dialogue: Martin Buber’s transformation of German social thought. Detroit: Wayne State UP.
Mendes-Flohr, P. (1997). Zarathustra’s apostle. In J. Golumb (Ed.), Nietzsche and Jewish culture (pp. 233–243). New York: Routledge.
Nehamas, A. (1985). Nietzsche: Life as literature. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Nietzsche, F. (1968). Werke VI.1. Kritische Gesamtausgabe. In G. Colli, & M. Montinari (Eds.), Also Sprache Zarathustra. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Parkes, G. (2005). Introduction. In G. Parkes (Ed.), Thus spoke Zarathustra. A book for everyone and nobody. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pippin, R. (2006). Introduction. In A. Del Caro & R. Pippin (Eds.), Thus spoke Zarathustra. A book for all and none. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scholem, G. (1961). Martin Buber’s hasidism: A critique. Commentary, 32, 305–318.
Seung, T. K. (2005). Nietzsche’s epic of the soul. Thus spoke Zarathustra. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Silberstein, L. (1989). Martin Buber’s social and religious thought. Alienation and the quest for meaning. New York: New York UP.
Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Belknap: Cambridge.
Urban, M. (2008). Aesthetics of renewal. Martin Buber’s early representation of Hasidism as Kulturkritik. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grollman, S. Prophets in a Secular Age: Nietzsche’s Also sprach Zarathustra and Buber’s Legende des Baalschem . Neophilologus 97, 367–382 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-012-9323-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-012-9323-3