Abstract
While Hume has often been held to have been an agnostic or atheist, several contemporary scholars have argued that Hume was a theist. These interpretations depend chiefly on several passages in which Hume allegedly confesses to theism. In this paper, I argue against this position by giving a threshold characterization of theism and using it to show that Hume does not confess. His most important “confession” does not cross this threshold and the ones that do are often expressive rather than assertive. I then argue that Hume is best interpreted as an atheist. Instead of interpreting Hume as a proto-logical positivist and arguing on the basis of Hume’s theories of meaning and method, I show that textually he appears to align himself with atheism, that his arguments in the Dialogues on Natural Religion support atheism, and that this position is most consistent with Hume’s naturalism. But, I hold that his atheism is “soft” and therefore distinct from that of his peers like Baron d’Holbach—while Hume really does reject theism, he neither embraces a dogmatically materialist position nor takes up a purely polemical stance towards theism. I conclude by suggesting several ways in which Hume’s atheistic philosophy of religion is relevant to contemporary discussions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andre S. (1993) Was Hume an atheist? Hume Studies 19(1): 141–166
Buckle S. (2007) Hume’s skeptical materialism. The Journal of Philosophy 82(4): 553–578
Capaldi N. (1970) Hume’s philosophy of religion: God without ethics. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1(4): 233–240
Clark S. (2009) No abiding city: Hume, naturalism, and toleration. The Journal of Philosophy 84(1): 75–94
Costelloe T. M. (2004) ‘In every civilized community’: Hume on belief and the demise of religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 55(3): 171–185
Gaskin J. C. A. (1988) Hume’s philosophy of religion. Humanities Press International, Atlantic Highlands, NJ
Gaskin J. C. A. (2008) Hume’s critique of religion. Journal of the History of Philosophy 14(3): 301–311
Hume, D. (1969). In E. C. Mossner (Ed.), A treatise of human nature. London: Penguin.
Hume, D. (1947). In Kemp Smith (Ed.), Dialogues concerning natural religion (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Hume, D. (1992). In J. Fieser (Ed.), The natural history of religion. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Hume, D. (1999). In T. L. Beauchamp (Ed.), An enquiry concerning human understanding. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Logan B. (1992) The irregular argument in Hume’s Dialogues. Hume Studies 18(2): 483–500
Logan B. (1993) A religion without talking. Peter Long Publishing, New York, NY
Logan B. (1996) Why Hume wasn’t an atheist: A reply to Andre. Hume Studies 22(1): 193–202
McEwen, B. (1907). Introduction to Dialogues concerning natural religion. Reprinted in S. Tweyman (Ed.) (1996), Hume on natural religion. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Mossner E. C. (1954) The life of David Hume. University of Texas Press, Austin
Nelson J. O. (1988) The role of part XII in Hume’s Dialogues concerning natural religion. Hume Studies 14(2): 347–371
Noxon, J. (1996). Hume’s agnosticism. Reprinted in V. C. Chappell (Ed.), Hume. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Noxon J. (2008) In defense of ‘Hume’s agnosticism’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 14(4): 469–473
Parent W. A. (1976) Philo’s confession. The Philosophical Quarterly 26(102): 63–68
Penelhum T. (1983) Natural belief and religious belief in Hume’s philosophy. The Philosophical Quarterly 33(131): 166–181
Pike N. (1985) Hume on the argument from design. In: Pike N. (eds) Hume: Dialogues concerning natural religion. Macmillan, New York, NY
Priestley, J. (1780). Letter 9: An examination of Mr. Hume’s Dialogues on natural religion. Reprinted in S. Tweyman (Ed.) (1996), Hume on natural religion. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Tweyman S. (1996) Natural belief and belief in an intelligent designer of the world. In: Tweyman S. (ed.) Essays on the philosophy of David Hume. Caravan Books, Delmar, NY
Yandell K. E. (1977) Hume on religious belief. In: Livingston D. W., King J. T. (eds) Hume: A re-evaluation. Fordham University Press, New York, NY
Yoder T. S. (2008) Hume on God. Continuum International Publishing Group, New York, NY
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cordry, B.S. A more dangerous enemy? Philo’s “confession” and Hume’s soft atheism. Int J Philos Relig 70, 61–83 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9274-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9274-1