Skip to main content
Log in

Herzl, Ahad Ha-'Am, and Berdichevsky: Comments on their nationalist concepts

  • Forum: Perspectives on Ahad Ha-'Am
  • Published:
Hîstôry¯a yêhûdît = Jewish history Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. On the question of nationalism, see Hans Kohn,Nationalism (New York, 1965), and George Mosse,Jews and Germans (New York, 1970), 3–33, 77–115. See also Shmuél Almog,Zionut ve-historia (Jerusalem, 1982), 13.

  2. See Theodor Herzl,Medinat ha-Yehudim (Jerusalem, 1983), 18–19. Regarding the non-Jewish character of the Jewish State, see Herzl,Old-New Land (Altneuland) (New York, 1960); Ahad Ha-'Am,Al parashat derakhim, vol. 3 (Berlin, 1921), 143–59.

    Google Scholar 

  3. On the Uganda controversy, see Michael Heymann,The Uganda Controversy, vols. 1 and 2 (Jerusalem, 1970, 1977); David Vital,Zionism: The Formative Years (Oxford, 1982), 267–364.

  4. Herzl,Medinat ha-Yehudim, 13, 22–23.

  5. Almog, 85.

  6. Herzl,Medinat ha-Yehudim, 68.

  7. Herzl,The Complete Diaries, ed. R. Patai (New York, 1960), 1:33, 40.

  8. Herzl,Diaries, 1:101.

  9. Herzl,Medinat ha-Yehudim, 30.

  10. Herzl,Diaries, 1:88–89.

  11. Herzl,Medinat ha-Yehudim, 9.

  12. Ahad Ha-'Am, “ha-Kongress ve-yozro,” inAl parashat derakhim, 3:56; Micha Joseph Berdichevsky,Ba-Derekh, vol. 3 (Leipzig, 1922), 112.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ahad Ha-'Am, “Shinui 'arakhin,” inAl parashat derakhim, 2:71–77.

  14. Ahad Ha-'Am, “Medinat ha-Yehudim ve-tzarat ha-Yehudim,” inAl parashat derakhim, 2:29.

  15. Ahad Ha-'Am, “Shinui 'arakhin,” 74.

  16. Ahad Ha-'Am, “Basar va-ruah,” inAl parashat derakhim, 3:230–31; “Pitz'ei ohev,” ibid., 1:20.

  17. Ahad Ha-'Am, “ha-Kongress ha-tzioni ha-rishon,” inAl parashat derakhim, 3:53–56; “Medinat ha-Yehudim ve-tzarat ha-Yehudim,” 29–31.

  18. Ahad Ha-'Am, “ha-Musar ha-leumi,” inAl parashat derakhim, 3:86–89.

  19. He stated: “Let us assume, as he claims, that essentially, from the point of view of Jewish morality, there is no objection to such marriage.” I believe that Ahad Ha-'Am's wording points to his disagreement with Nordau's assertion. but that he preferred not to dispute it, emphasizing instead the moral duty of the nationalist to be concerned about national survival and thus refrain from intermarriage. Ahad Ha-'Am, “ha-Musar ha-leumi,” 86–89.

  20. See his reference to Treitchke in M. Y. Berdichevsky,Al ha-Perek (Warsaw, 1899), 72–75.

  21. M. Y. Berdichevsky,Makhshavot ve-Torot, vol. 1 (Leipzig, 1922), 31–33; “Shinui 'Arakhin,” inBa-Derekh, 2:77.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Berdichevsky,Makhshavot, 34–38.

  23. Berdichevsky, “Shinui 'arakhin,” 53, 62.

  24. Berdichevsky,Makhshavot, 34.

  25. Berdichevsky, “Hirhurim,” inBa-Derekh, 2:61.

  26. Ibid., 58.

  27. Ibid., 61.

  28. Berdichevsky, “She'elot ve-he'arot,” inBa-Derekh, 2:81.

  29. Berdichevsky, “Tziyunim,” inBa-Derekh, 2:72.

  30. Ibid., 77.

  31. Ahad Ha-'Am, “Shalosh madregot,” inAl parashat derakhim, 2:65.

  32. Ahad Ha-'Am, “Tehiyat ha-ruah,” inAl parashat derakhim, 2:117.

  33. Berdichevsky,Ba-Derekh, 2:80.

  34. Berdichevsky, “Me-'Eretz Yisra'el le-'Eretz Stam,” inBa-Derekh, 3:80f.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper was conceived and written when I was a fellow at the Annenberg Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shapira, A. Herzl, Ahad Ha-'Am, and Berdichevsky: Comments on their nationalist concepts. Jew History 4, 59–69 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01668652

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01668652

Navigation