feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2020
    Titel der Quelle: Jewish Quarterly Review
    Angaben zur Quelle: 110,4 (2020) 652-678
    Keywords: Temple of Jerusalem (Jerusalem, Israel) In rabbinical literature ; Midrash rabbah. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Bible Criticism, interpretation, etc., Christian ; Judaism Relations ; Christianity
    Abstract: This essay examines a distinct recurrent theme in rabbinic literature in which three stages of the Temple—built, destroyed, and rebuilt—are foreseen by figures in Genesis. This theme, which first appears in a composite passage in Sifre Deuteronomy, presents a unique, tripartite mythic image of Temple history, in which the period of destruction is perceived as a significant part of history, separating two Temples: that of the past and that of the future. This theme is complexly developed in Genesis Rabbah, structurally, exegetically, and thematically, as it is woven throughout the tales of Genesis and is enriched by intertextual links to key texts regarding the Temple elsewhere in the Bible. These elements may be viewed in light of the destruction's depiction by Church Fathers as a permanent stage that proves the temporality of God's covenant with Israel, and as part of a widely recorded exegetical debate regarding eschatological Old Testament prophecies that predict the rebuilding of Zion. Particular contrasts stand out in comparison to Eusebius of Caesarea's Demonstratio Evangelica, in which the Temple and the patriarchs also stand at the heart of a comprehensive polemical historiography and a tripartite model of religious history. These points demonstrate that this recurrent rabbinic theme is best understood as part of a broader polemical discourse between Jews and Christians in which stories from Genesis and the destruction of the Temple played a key role in constructing identities, interpreting biblical sources, and formulating an understanding of religious history and the progression of time.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Language: Hebrew
    Year of publication: 2016
    Titel der Quelle: מחקרי ירושלים בספרות עברית
    Angaben zur Quelle: כח (תשעו) 55-82
    Keywords: Dinah ; Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Talmud Yerushalmi. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Midrash rabbah. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Prayer in rabbinical literature ; Piyyutim Criticism, Textual
    Note: כולל תקציר באנגלית.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Language: Hebrew
    Year of publication: 2020
    Titel der Quelle: תרביץ
    Angaben zur Quelle: פז,ד (תשף) 553-586
    Keywords: Maimonides, Moses, ; Mishnah Criticism, Textual ; Mishnah Language, style ; Eretz Israel Boundaries (Jewish law)
    Abstract: This paper traces the references to and interpretations of Amana/Amanam, a site on the northern border of the land of Israel, from the early Palestinian traditions of the Mishnah through its printed editions, with a special emphasis on Maimonides’ commentary on the Mishnah. I show that הנמא, the dominant spelling in Mishnah editions and in scholarship to this very day, is actually secondary. Earlier versions of the Mishnah have other spellings – such as Amanam, Amanos or Hamanos – which probably refer to the Amanus mountain range in Southern Turkey, a well-known border point in antiquity, as some scholars have correctly suggested. However, over time, as the geographic location lost its significance, the site has been identified with the biblical location of הָנָמֲא, one of the anti-lebanon mountains, apparently due to a misinterpretation of an amoraic homily. This ultimately led to the change in spelling in the later versions of the Mishnah, which can be traced unequivocally to the version employed by Maimonides himself in his commentary of the Mishnah. Through a close reading of Maimonides’ writings, I uncover a deliberate and surprisingly uncharacteristic emendation to the text of the Mishnah on the part of Maimonides, offering a rare glimpse into his methodology and his approach to the intensive work of interpreting the Mishnah.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...