feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: The Character of David in Judaism, Christianity and Islam; Warrior, Poet, Prophet and King
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2021) 509-522
    Keywords: Frank, Jacob, ; David, ; Gender identity ; Presence of God (Judaism) ; Messianism History
    Abstract: The article explores the reception of King David and the shaping of his image in the teaching of Jacob Frank (1726–1791). It investigates the reason why David caught Frank’s attention, despite his having abandoned the traditional messianic idea of the restoration of the kingdom of David in the Holy Land. It also demonstrates that Frank viewed David as “secretly a woman” (an incarnation of the Shekhinah) and delves into the question of how this Davidic femininity should be understood. Finally, it deals with Frank’s idea that the arrival of the messianic era will put an end to gender segregation.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Language: Polish
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: Kwartalnik Historii Żydów
    Angaben zur Quelle: 278 (2021) 455-486
    Keywords: Frank, Jacob, ; Shabbethai Tzevi, ; Jewish messianic movements ; Frankism History
    Abstract: For historians it is obvious that Frankism was born as a messianic movement and stayed that way until Jakub Frank’s death in 1791. The assumption of a messianic background of the Frankist élan has far-reaching implications for the understanding of the history of Frankism, its inner conflicts and the figure of its charismatic leader himself. This is why I suggest looking for answers to several questions related to this matter, namely, who Jakub Frank was for Podolia Sabbateans—whom we describe as Frankists today—where he intended to lead them and how he saw his own role in this journey? And also: how did they see his redemptive effort after his death? To historians it appeared obvious that the founder and leader of a messianic movement acts as the messiah. However, this is not so obvious with regard to Frankism. The movement was born among Polish followers of messiahs who were no longer alive: Sabbatai Zevi and Baruchja. It is not, however, certain if it was the messianic motifs that persuaded them to start a confrontation with the rabbinical orthodoxy in 1756, followed by baptism. The doubts regarding the messianic nature of the movement stem from the fact that it was not connected with messianic propaganda. In this community, no redemption dates were set, nor are we aware of messianic prophecies gaining ground in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth at the time. In early Frankist sources we will not find a promise of coming salvation, which should, after all, be the main driving force of messianic actions. Frank was not anointed as messiah by Baruchja, who died before he was born, nor by his son and successor, whom he only ever met once. His first teachers who gave him an insight in the Sabbatean doctrine introduced Baruchja’s son to him as the messiah. Later on, Frank insisted that he was called to serve as the messiah by the heavens themselves. It was the heavens that ordered him to complete the mission which Sabbatai Zevi and Baruchja started but were unable to complete. Therefore he succeeded them by the divine will. He could not dissociate himself from his predecessors because he acted among their followers, who were by then a little wearied of waiting for the messianic revolution and desperate because of the failure of successive promises of redemption. As a self-styled leader he had to seek credibility in their eyes by following the path chosen by his predecessors, while at the same time distancing himself from them and name the reasons for their failures. He posed as the third messiah after Sabbatai and Baruchja, who will complete the work begun by them. However, he lacked consistency with regard to the questions of the nature of a messiah and his divine reincarnation that were central to Sabbataism and we present the twisted arguments presented in his teachings in detail in this article.
    Note: With an English abstract.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Article
    Article
    In:  Kwartalnik Historii Żydów 276 (2020) 787-829
    Language: Polish
    Year of publication: 2020
    Titel der Quelle: Kwartalnik Historii Żydów
    Angaben zur Quelle: 276 (2020) 787-829
    Keywords: Judaism Relations 1500- ; Christianity ; Jews Politics and government ; Jews History 1500- ; Poland Ethnic relations ; History
    Abstract: It is not certain when the central organization of the Jews of Poland, known in its mature form as the Sejm of Four Lands (Waad Arba Aracot), was formed. In 1581, it was officially recognized (as an assembly of Jewish elders of Poland and Lithuania) as a state authority responsible for the collection of poll tax from the Jews, with all the prerogatives that go with it. The assemblies of “Jewish elders” were already convened many decades earlier, attending to many vital problems of the Jewish community. The authorities of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth authorities knew about it and tolerated it, and would even enter into disputes with them. This shows that they were convinced about their effectiveness if they entrusted them with the collection of taxes, an area in which they themselves were not terribly successful until then. The Sejm (parliament) of the Jews of the Commonwealth was established relatively late by European standard, as it was not noted in the state documents until the late 16th century. There can be no doubt when they were introducing it, Polish Jews followed a pattern they knew from other countries. The Jewish community, which from the late Middle Ages migrated in huge numbers form Western Europe to Polish lands, relied on patterns and inspiration from the West, especially the neighboring German Reich. Only in the European context is it possible to determine which elements of the history of the assembly of Poland’s Jews was typical of all such assemblies in Christian Europe and what was the local ingredient, and consequently decide whether it was rightly (with which I concur) regarded as an exceptional institution in Jewish history. For this reason, we first look at the history of European waads, with special emphasis on the Reich waad, before proceeding to present the history of Jewish self-government bodies in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Available writings paint an almost exclusively apologetic picture of the operation of the Jewish parliament of the Commonwealth. It is regularly portrayed as a developed system of the Jews’ autonomy, defending the Jews as a whole from the Christian environment and laying down internal rules. Indeed, its positive role in defending the interests of the Jewish community cannot be doubted. It has done a lot to strengthen the unity and the identity of the Jews in the Polish Republic, enhanced their sense of their own value, resolved disputes between the kahals, established many autonomous institutions, just to mention the supreme religious court whose sessions coincided with the Sejm’s sessions. On the other hand, the dark chapters in the history of the Jewish Sejm tend to be ignored. Yet in at least three areas the legacy of this Sejm’s activity appears rather dubious. The first dark chapter was certainly the censorship of Jewish publications. The strict preventive censorship introduced by the Jewish Sejm toward the end of the 17th century was the reason why the publishing of Jewish books, which flourished until then in Polish lands, declined. The second such chapter was the suppression of regional Ashkenazi tradition to replace them with the Sephardic system of religious law, codified by Josef Karo in Shulchan Aruch. The third area was the struggle against new religious trends, which particularly after 1666, i.e. from the birth of Sabbataism and its Polish offshoot (Frankism), repeatedly stirred the Polish Jews’ spiritual life. It was no accident that Hasidism was born and became a mass movement when and because of the winding up of the Sejm of Four Lands. These downsides of the activities of the Sejm should also be taken into account when making a comprehensive assessment of the activities of this Sejm.
    Note: With an English summary.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Language: Hebrew
    Pages: 202 Seiten
    Year of publication: 2021
    Series Statement: Źródła do studiów nad duchowością żydów
    Series Statement: Źródła do studiów nad duchowością żydów
    Keywords: Chassidismus
    Abstract: Dwujęzyczna edycja najważniejszego i najbardziej znanego zbioru nauk i pouczeń religijnych Izraela ben Eliezera, zwanego Baal Szem Towem (1700-1760). Ten charyzmatyczny mistyk plebejski i cudotwórca – uznany przez tradycję żydowską za założyciela i pierwszego nauczyciela chasydyzmu na ziemiach polskich – nie pozostawił po sobie żadnych własnych pism. Nauczanie Baal Szema znamy jedynie ze świadectw i notatek jego słuchaczy, publikowanych wiele lat po śmierci mistyka. Wszyscy wielcy cadycy i nauczyciele chasydyzmu drugiej połowy XVIII wieku uważani są za uczniów Izraela ben Eliezera lub uczniów jego uczniów.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Book
    Book
    Warszawa [Warschau] : Żydowski Instytut Historyczny im. Emanuela Ringelbluma
    Language: Polish
    Pages: 299 Seiten, [2] Blatt
    Year of publication: 2023
    Keywords: Frank, Jacob ; Messianismus
    Abstract: Wybitny znawca żydowskiego mesjanizmu, autor wielu studiów o Jakubie Franku, w najnowszej książce podsumowuje i rewiduje wnioski swoich niemal czterdziestoletnich badań poświęconych założycielowi ruchu zwanego później frankizmem. Wykorzystując wszystkie dostępne źródła – zarówno żydowskie, jak i chrześcijańskie (niektóre z nich w książce Jana Doktóra publikowane są po raz pierwszy) – autor dokonuje ponownej rekonstrukcji dziejów Jakuba Franka i jego zwolenników. Stawia przy tym fundamentalne pytania – np. o okoliczności powstania dokumentów, które dotychczas były uznawane przez badaczy frankizmu za wiarygodne i na podstawie których budowali oni swoje interpretacje i teorie. Jak zaznacza w recenzji książki prof. Michał Galas, takie polemiczne stanowisko także wobec własnych osiągnięć badawczych jest rzadkością w świecie nauki. Frankizm jest najbardziej „polskim” ze wszystkich żydowskich ruchów mesjańsko-mistycznych. Jego dzieje na trwałe wpisały się nie tylko w dzieje judaizmu, ale także polskiego katolicyzmu i stanowią ważny temat dyskursu na temat relacji żydowsko-polskich i żydowsko-chrześcijańskich, jaki toczył się na przestrzeni ostatnich 200 lat. Te dyskusje i polemiki, często posiadające piętno antysemityzmu, dalekie były od rzetelnych studiów naukowych i utwierdzały wiele stereotypów. Stąd z tak wielką satysfakcją należy przyjąć tę nową publikację poświęconą frankizmowi. – fragment recenzji dr. hab. Michała Galasa, Uniwersytet Jagielloński
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...