feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Article
    Article
    In:  מכאן; כתב-עת לחקר הספרות והתרבות היהודית והישראלית כ (תשף) 100-140
    Language: Hebrew
    Year of publication: 2020
    Titel der Quelle: מכאן; כתב-עת לחקר הספרות והתרבות היהודית והישראלית
    Angaben zur Quelle: כ (תשף) 100-140
    Keywords: Hebrew literature, Modern History and criticism 19th century ; Hebrew literature Language ; Haskalah History ; Judaism in literature
    Note: With an English summary.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2021
    Titel der Quelle: Jewish Social Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 26,2 (2021) 126-169
    Keywords: Spinoza, Benedictus de, Criticism and interpretation ; Wessely, Naphtali Herz, Criticism and interpretation ; Lowth, Robert, Criticism and interpretation ; Mendelssohn, Moses, Criticism and interpretation ; Bible Evidences, authority, etc. ; History ; Bible Criticism, interpretation, etc., Jewish 18th century ; History ; Bible Philosophy ; History ; Haskalah ; Rhetoric
    Abstract: This article proposes a theoretical basis for understanding a crucial component of the maskilic literary approach to Scripture, which many proponents of the Jewish Enlightenment referred to as meliẓah (eloquent or figurative language). Once a venerated concept, it declined following the late nineteenth-century neo-romantic critique of Haskalah literature. Beginning with a brief discussion of Moses Mendelssohn, this article explores these themes by examining the work of Benedict de Spinoza, Robert Lowth, and Naftali Herz Wessely. Pursuing a unique mode of interpretation, these four thinkers strongly affirmed the role of figurative language in Hebrew Scripture, thus promoting an emphatically rhetorical approach to scriptural language. Mendelssohn, Spinoza, Lowth, and Wessely believed that figurative language played a constitutive role in the formation of the anagogical meaning of Scripture and that this meaning was conflictual and open-ended due to its reliance on persuasion, public deliberation, and the use of eloquent speech. While scholars have suggested that maskilim tended to read the Jewish Enlightenment as a movement that either re-sanctified or desacralized Scripture, this article shows that proponents of the much-maligned meliẓah literature were keen on showing that Scripture is not a container of philosophical knowledge. For them, what made Scripture sacred was not its truth—which could be manipulated at will—but its engagement in an often inconclusive struggle between sacredness and secularity, reason and revelation, mythical and philosophical conceptions of God.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Article
    Article
    In:  Prooftexts; a Journal of Jewish Literary History 38,2 (2020) 238-277
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2020
    Titel der Quelle: Prooftexts; a Journal of Jewish Literary History
    Angaben zur Quelle: 38,2 (2020) 238-277
    Keywords: Haskalah History 19th century ; Hebrew literature, Modern History and criticism 19th century ; Hebrew literature Language
    Abstract: Associated with translation (Genesis 42:23), figurative speech (Proverbs 1:6), and prophecy (Genesis Rabbah 44:1), melitsah was a venerable term in medieval, renaissance, and Haskalah literary thought. Designating rhetoric, eloquent speech, poetry, and rhetorical theory, it was a focus of considerable attention during the period of European Haskalah (1780–1880). Since the mid-nineteenth century, and increasingly since the rise of neoromantic and nationalist literary ideologies, the poetic practice of melitsah became a target of severe attacks, which ultimately led to a sematic change in its meaning. While brief scholarly studies of this term have been undertaken, its evolving history, as well as its potential for critique of modern literary practice, have been completely overlooked by scholars of modern Hebrew literature. The present article attempts to study the concept of melitsah outside the framework of the massive denunciation it suffered due to the rise of competing literary discourses. Stressing the deep affinity between Hebrew melitsah and Renaissance rhetoric, the article demonstrates that, rather than an instrument for assimilating Hebrew literature to Enlightenment ideas of knowledge, poetry or politics, maskilim employed melitsah-based theory for defending and upholding ancient Hebrew scriptures as vessels of theological, poetic, and political difference, which they saw as contributing to a critique of dominant Enlightenment ideas. Associating melitsah with a recent paradigm shift in the study of Jewish Enlightenment, this article follows key maskilim who studied the melitsah, showing that their veneration of the scriptural Hebrew is not an expression of blindfolded cult of biblical commonplaces, as many scholars have believed, but an attempt to glean from Hebrew scripture—through poetic analyses, readings, and adaptation—a host of theological, poetic, and political ideas that, couched as they are in the figurative language of scripture, supplements and displaces ideas whose origin is not textual.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...