feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Material
Language
Years
  • 1
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: The Journal of Holocaust Research
    Angaben zur Quelle: 36,1 (2022) 77-88
    Keywords: Bauer, Yehuda ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Public opinion ; Jews Attitudes ; United States Politics and government 20th century
    Abstract: Beginning with well-deserved personal praise for Professor Yehuda Bauer celebrating his 95th birthday, this article then examines Bauer's brief but important work Could the US Government Have Rescued European Jewry?, in which he challenges the preferred narrative of American and Israeli Jews: that American Jews were silent, ineffective, divided, timid, self-absorbed, weak, and incapable of bringing a Judeo-centric request to the American political establishment and did not effectively come the aid of their European brethren; that American Jew had the power to do something significant, if only they had tried to use it; and that the American government was antisemitic or, at best, unconcerned about Jews. The article then examines Bauer's contentions regarding the US government's and American Jews' capabilities, interest, and responsibility in saving European Jews. Bauer's consideration is divided into four periods: from 1933 until the Reich's November Pogroms in 1938; from Kristallnacht until the onset of the war in September 1939; from the war until the beginnings of the systematic murder of the Jews, which coincided with the German invasion of the Soviet Union on 22 June 1941; and finally during the period of the mass murder, which only ended at the war's end on 8 May 1945. Bauer reconsiders the controversial issue of the bombing of Auschwitz, which he examines from the perspective of the Yishuv in Palestine and the British and American bombing capabilities and wartime priorities as well as the effectiveness of aerial bombardment. The paper also considers Elie Wiesel's challenging of multiple US presidents regarding the decision not to bomb and questions Wiesel's depiction of his discussion with President Jimmy Carter on this issue. Ultimately Bauer's conclusion is that US was not powerful or well-positioned enough to save European Jews, and the Jewish community in the United States did not have the power to impose its will even if it had tried.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: The Journal of Holocaust Research
    Angaben zur Quelle: 36,1 (2022) 24-29
    Keywords: Bauer, Yehuda ; International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Study and teaching
    Abstract: Professor Yehuda Bauer is a world-renowned scholar of the Holocaust, antisemitism, and genocide. Nevertheless, his activities and impact in public policy have become a major focus of his efforts, particularly in recent years. This article examines Bauer's impact on perhaps the most prominent of these efforts: that of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). The IHRA has become a major factor in international Holocaust remembrance and in combating antisemitism. Drawing on conversations with Bauer and close colleagues from academia and diplomacy in IHRA, as well as their personal experience, with one of the authors being a longstanding student and colleague (Porat) and the other being involved with IHRA since its inception 20 years ago (Weitzman), the authors describe Bauer's role as the “founding father” of the IHRA, how the organization began, the specific and unique nature of the IHRA, and Bauer's role in two of the IHRA's most important achievements: the Working Definition of Holocaust Denial and Distortion and the Working Definition of Antisemitism. We also briefly discuss some of the issues and challenges that the IHRA has experienced as part of its growth from the original five members to its current configuration of 35 countries and Bauer's assessment of where the IHRA stands now and its possible future.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: The Journal of Holocaust Research
    Angaben zur Quelle: 36,1 (2022) 39-43
    Keywords: Moses, A. Dirk Criticism and interpretation ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Research ; Germany Relations
    Abstract: This article deals with the debate over Dirk Moses' essay “The German Catechism,” which sparked controversy after its publication in May 2021. In his piece, Moses argues that the Holocaust should be examined in unison with the genocides perpetrated during colonialism. This article criticizes Moses' interpretation that questions the singularity of the Holocaust, stressing instead that the Shoah is fundamentally different from other historical crimes. It reveals the inherent flaws in Moses' essay, while pointing to the potentially dangerous influence of the postcolonial thought advocated by Moses on anti-Israel sentiment and the rise of antisemitism.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: The Journal of Holocaust Research
    Angaben zur Quelle: 36,1 (2022) 30-38
    Keywords: Bauer, Yehuda ; Lemkin, Raphael, ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Research ; Genocide Research
    Abstract: This article examines Yehuda Bauer's treatment of the concepts of Holocaust and genocide as well as Raphael Lemkin's understanding of the relationship between genocide and settler colonialism. “Intent” has been central to the concept of genocide (both in Lemkin's definition and in the UN Convention) but difficult to locate and identify in the historical practice of settler colonialism, despite the destruction of groups as such that the latter has caused. This article argues for two concepts of genocide: systematic and systemic. The former, based on the Holocaust paradigm, focuses on intent, while the latter, based on settler colonialism, focuses on outcome.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Article
    Article
    In:  The Journal of Holocaust Research 36,1 (2022) 68-76
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: The Journal of Holocaust Research
    Angaben zur Quelle: 36,1 (2022) 68-76
    Keywords: Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Public opinion ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Press coverage ; Jews Attitudes
    Abstract: The question of what was known in Hungary about the Holocaust has been a mainstay of research on that chapter since the time of the Kasztner libel trial in the mid-1950s. New studies on various aspects of the subject and new sources that have become available make it worthwhile to revisit it. It is now clear that news about the Nazi persecution of Jews reached Hungary soon after it began and continued to arrive in the period preceding the German occupation in spring 1944. This included information about the massacre of Hungarian Jews at Kam'yanets-Podilskyy in 1941 and Jews in Novi Sad in the Hungarian occupation zone in Serbia in 1942. From the second half of 1941 through the occupation, Hungarian soldiers and Hungarian Jewish labor servicemen learned about mass murder of Jews and brought news back to Hungary. The destruction of Jews was discussed in the Hungarian Jewish press. The activists of the Budapest Relief and Rescue Committee, led by Kasztner and Otto Komoly, were also a conduit for information. Very specific information, including about Auschwitz, reached Hungary in January 1944 when the Hashomer Hatsair leader from Będzin, Chajka Klinger, who had escaped to Hungary, gave her testimony. Around that time, Zionist youth movement emissaries were sent from Budapest to the provinces and, after encountering Klinger's message, passed it on. Despite the availability of much information, as Yehuda Bauer explained many years ago in an article, there is a gap between information and knowledge. To a large extent this gap regarding the events of the Holocaust, which a great many Hungarian Jews did not bridge, derived from the unprecedented nature of the Holocaust.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: The Journal of Holocaust Research
    Angaben zur Quelle: 36,1 (2022) 16-23
    Keywords: Bauer, Yehuda ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Research
    Abstract: Yehuda Bauer has been the world's teacher of the Holocaust and has influenced the study of the Holocaust perhaps more than anyone else in the last 50 years. Bauer has significantly affected the author's own professional work, probably more than any other teacher. In addition to Bauer being a scholarly and teaching role model, the author was exposed to and learned much about the world of journal editing from him while serving as the assistant editor of Holocaust and Genocide Studies under Bauer's editorship, which subsequently helped open a long career as the editor of Yad Vashem Studies. This article reflects on two aspects of Yehuda Bauer's work and their influence on the author as scholar and teacher: looking at the Holocaust at eye level, without tinted lenses, mystification, or ideological prejudice as much as that is possible; taking the Jewish eyewitnesses to events seriously. Finally, the article discusses Bauer's clear-eyed and objective approach to the Holocaust through the subject of the Allies' responses to the Holocaust, a topic the author first encountered academically in one of Bauer's seminars more than 40 years ago. Bauer has addressed questions regarding what Allied leaders knew about the Holocaust, what they did to try to stop it, the role of American Jewry, why the Allies did not bomb Auschwitz, and more in what is arguably the most balanced, ideology-free analysis by any scholar. We should all learn from this approach to the subject.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: The Journal of Holocaust Research
    Angaben zur Quelle: 36,1 (2022) 44-49
    Keywords: Bauer, Yehuda ; Antisemitism Terminology
    Abstract: Intense debates are underway about what constitutes antisemitism, who has the right to define it, how extreme anti-Israel animus should figure in to such discussions, and even whether the term antisemitism should designate hostility to Jews alone or be broadened to include other “Semites.” Yehuda Bauer has made seminal contributions to these debates, including on the preferred spelling of the term: with a hyphen, as in “anti-Semitism,” or without, as in “antisemitism.” This article pays tribute to Professor Bauer for his critical interventions on these matters, which go well beyond orthographic niceties and can illuminate the essence of Jew-hatred itself. As an extension of these concerns, the article raises similar questions about the best way to spell the term that designates eliminationist opposition to Zionism and Israel: with a hyphen, as in “anti-Zionism,” or without, as in “antizionism.”
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: The Journal of Holocaust Research
    Angaben zur Quelle: 36,1 (2022) 60-67
    Keywords: Bauer, Yehuda ; Jews History ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Research
    Abstract: Yehuda Bauer is well known for his public leadership in Holocaust and genocide studies. This article, however, sheds light on another aspect of Bauer's historiography: most of his research studies—that is, those for which he dove into primary archival research and that are focused on more concrete historical topics, rather than general overviews, and have an extensive scholarly apparatus—deal with Jewish history only and, more precisely, with some very clear topics within it. They surround the Holocaust as an event but tackle a much deeper issue: the uniqueness of the Jewish people as a historical phenomenon, explored through the prism of the Shoah. Six clusters of studies, which are inter-related and often intertwine and overlap, can be discerned in this oeuvre: (1) his studies on the Brichah movement; (2) his trilogy on the history of the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee; (3) his ongoing polemic regarding the American Jewish community's commitment to and investment in rescue activities of European Jewry and its (in)ability to influence US administration policies; (4) his studies on the behavior of Jewish leadership under Nazi rule; (5) his studies on the negotiations between Jewish groups and individuals and the Nazis on rescue during the Shoah; and (6) his studies of the phenomenon of Jewish communal organization and its modes of functioning, even during the last days of the Eastern European shtetlach. To these topics a seventh topic that bothered Bauer—which is quite astonishing in view of his firm stance in favor of Jewish secularism—is examined: religious Jewry and the possibility of faith in God after the Holocaust. Thus, it is claimed here, Bauer remained “on speaking terms” with God, but that his stance is mehutzaf (“contrary”)—the term he uses to describe a basic characteristic of the Jews in general.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: The Journal of Holocaust Research
    Angaben zur Quelle: 36,1 (2022) 96-109
    Keywords: Bauer, Yehuda ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Public opinion ; Holocaust victims
    Abstract: The Polish general elections of 2015 brought to power a right-wing, nationalistic party called PiS (Law & Justice). Since then, the nationalists have been busy dismantling the fundamental components of the democratic system, appropriating the entire machinery of the state, and attacking independent judges and journalists. However, their obsession with the defense of the so-called good name of the nation made history one of the most internationally visible areas of confrontation. And Holocaust studies, Holocaust research, and Holocaust education quickly found themselves at the very heart of this struggle over the past. In order to defend the myth of the alleged national innocence during the war, the Polish authorities have become one of the chief agents of Holocaust distortion worldwide. A number of institutions are now involved in a relentless campaign intended to prove that rescuing the Jews during the Shoah was the default position of Polish society. Driven by a phenomenon known as “Holocaust envy,” the official narrative multiplies the ranks of Polish Righteous Among the Nations and strives to present the Polish suffering, and the Polish physical losses, at par with the Jewish ones. The research into the scale of Polish complicity in the Holocaust therefore raises particular ire of the Polish state. Conservative estimates indicate that around 200,000 Jews were either killed or denounced to the Germans by the Poles.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2022
    Titel der Quelle: The Journal of Holocaust Research
    Angaben zur Quelle: 36,1 (2022) 7-15
    Keywords: Bauer, Yehuda ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) Research
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...