feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Article
    Article
    In:  New Testament Studies 65,3 (2019) 371-387
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2019
    Titel der Quelle: New Testament Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 65,3 (2019) 371-387
    Keywords: New Testament. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; New Testament. Relation to the Bible
    Abstract: Most modern commentaries and translations of the Gospel of John take John 6.52 to read: "How can this man give us his flesh to eat?" There is, however, an important variant reading here that lacks the αὐτοῦ (thus: "How can this man give us flesh to eat?"), which has received very little attention. This article contends that the shorter reading creates yet another example of Johannine dramatic irony, as the contempt of οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι for Jesus' teaching echoes the unbelief of the wilderness generation who were "given flesh to eat" along with the manna. The article tentatively concludes that this intertextual reading advances the "internal probability" of the shorter text.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2019
    Titel der Quelle: New Testament Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 65,3 (2019) 398-411
    Keywords: Abraham ; New Testament. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; New Testament. Relation to the Bible ; Messiah New Testament teaching
    Abstract: In Gal 3.16 Paul asserts that Abraham's seed is the messiah. While some have suggested that the rationale for this assertion is Paul's identification of Abraham's seed with David's seed, few have identified evidence for this rationale in the immediate context of Galatians 3, and none have genuinely argued for it. Noting that the reappropriation of scriptural idioms is a common feature of ancient messiah discourse, I demonstrate that Gal 3.19 entails a reappropriation of the wording of Gen 49.10, an oracle often interpreted as Davidic-messianic, and thereby I elucidate the scriptural reasoning undergirding Gal 3.16.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Article
    Article
    In:  New Testament Studies 65,2 (2019) 139-147
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2019
    Titel der Quelle: New Testament Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 65,2 (2019) 139-147
    Keywords: New Testament. Language, style ; Jews in the New Testament
    Abstract: According to UBS5 and NA28, Mark 7.3 says that Pharisees and other Jews do not eat unless they rinse their hands "with a fist" (πυγμῇ). This notorious crux interpretum has resisted all efforts to give it a plausible meaning. The present article reviews these efforts and suggests that it is time to abandon this reading in favour of the variant reading πυκνά in the sense "repeatedly". This translation best fits the practice described in the Mishnah and other rabbinic literature, in which devout Jews rinsed their hands twice before the meal, twice after, and often twice or more during.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2019
    Titel der Quelle: New Testament Studies
    Angaben zur Quelle: 66,3 (2019) 367-391
    Keywords: Martyn, J. Louis ; New Testament. Criticism, interpretation, etc. ; Jews in the New Testament ; Pharisees New Testament teaching ; Sabbath New Testament teaching ; Synagogues New Testament teaching
    Abstract: In History and Theology in the Fourth Gospel, Martyn argued that John 9.22 concerns the formal expulsion from the synagogue of Jews who were confessing Jesus as the Messiah of Jewish expectation. Johannine scholars following Martyn have often claimed that a ‘high’ Christology must have provided the catalyst for this trauma, not the ‘low’ Christology posited by Martyn. For Martyn, however, a ‘high’ Christology was a subsequent development, leading to a second trauma, that of execution for blasphemously claiming that Jesus was somehow equal to God. Accepting Martyn's argument on 9.22 with respect to this issue, and leaving aside the debate about the relevance of the Birkat ha-Minim, this article seeks to determine why local synagogue authorities, evidently represented in John's narrative by the Pharisees, would have found the acceptance of Jesus as Messiah so offensive that they formulated a decree to expel fellow Jews espousing this new messianic faith. Analysis of John 5, 7 and 9 demonstrates that the Pharisees in the Johannine setting found this confession offensive because they regarded the behaviour of Johannine disciples on the Sabbath as thoroughly inconsistent with their own understanding of the Sabbath commandment and as significantly hindering their desire to play an authoritative role in determining what counted as acceptable behaviour on the Sabbath and what did not. In short, the specific catalyst for expelling Jews confessing Jesus as Messiah from the synagogue was their Sabbath observance, which the Pharisees in the Johannine setting came to regard as an unacceptable deviation from their own developing views on the matter in the period after 70 ce.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...