Language:
English
Year of publication:
2022
Titel der Quelle:
Vetus Testamentum
Angaben zur Quelle:
72,2 (2022) 237-256
Keywords:
Eli (priest)
;
Bible. Criticism, interpretation, etc.
;
Priests, Jewish Biblical teaching
Abstract:
Scholars have struggled to reach consensus about the literary relationship between the anti-Elide material in 1 Sam 2–3 and the so-called “Ark Narrative” in 1 Sam 4–6. I propose a new resolution to this problem. I argue that the two named characters, Hophni and Phinehas, have been introduced secondarily to and independently from the unnamed “sons of Eli” and represent a redactional layer that runs through chs. 1–2, and 4. Before the addition of these characters, the “sons of Eli” designated a generic priesthood associated with the character, Eli. The material about this priesthood is comprised of discrete passages that have been appended to Samuel’s birth story and its extension. The anti-Elide material was later connected to 1 Sam 4 through the addition of Hophni and Phinehas, who serve to recast the Elides’ iniquities as the reason for the Israelite defeat and loss of the ark.
DOI:
10.1163/15685330-bja10050
URL:
Locate this publication in Israeli libraries
Permalink