Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Last 7 Days Catalog Additions

Export
  • 1
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2016
    Titel der Quelle: Interpreting Primo Levi
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2016) 7-20
    Keywords: Levi, Primo, Criticism and interpretation ; Améry, Jean Criticism and interpretation ; Holocaust survivors' writings History and criticism ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945), in literature ; Holocaust survivors Psychology
    Abstract: Primo Levi was the twentieth century’s preeminent witness—preeminent both in general and, more specifically, among the voices that sought to draw attention to the shape of its central disfiguring tragedy. Levi attained this position because, as Philip Roth wrote of him shortly after his death, he had “the moral stamina and intellectual poise of a twentieth century Titan:”1 Levi’s name will forever be associated with Auschwitz, where he was imprisoned between February 1944 and January 1945. Indeed, he himself later said that but for his time there he would probably not have become a writer.2 I find this hard to credit in view of his exceptional wisdom about life and the world even as early as his mid-20s, when he composed his memoir of Auschwitz, If This Is a Man.3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2016
    Titel der Quelle: Interpreting Primo Levi
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2016) 173-186
    Keywords: Levi, Primo, Literary style ; Holocaust survivors' writings History and criticism ; Jewish authors ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945), in literature
    Abstract: Amoral urgency of testimony and an untiring scientific curiosity stand out as the distinguishing characteristics of Primo Levi’s works. His eminence as a witness, however, is not the only reason for his rhetorical effectiveness: Levi systematically deploys the ethical authority of literature in his writing, both as an institution and as a set of discursive practices, through a system of citations and representations modeled on canonic texts, from Homer to Shakespeare and Rabelais. His meditations on ethics and testimony are constantly in dialogue with literary tradition, from Dante in If This Is a Man, to Manzoni in The Drowned and the Saved.3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2016
    Titel der Quelle: Interpreting Primo Levi
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2016) 37-49
    Keywords: Levi, Primo, Criticism and interpretation ; Holocaust survivors' writings History and criticism ; Nazi concentration camp inmates Language ; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945), in literature ; Translating and interpreting in literature
    Abstract: “We can and must communicate,” Primo Levi states uncompromisingly at the beginning of the chapter “Communicating” in I sommersi e i salvati (The Drowned and the Saved). He sharply dismisses the notion of incomunicabilità—the inability of alienated individuals in capitalist societies to convey thoughts or feelings to others—made famous by the debates arising from the films of Michelangelo Antonioni, and makes his point by referring to a scene from one of Antonioni’s films, The Red Desert (1964). Toward the end of the film, the main character wanders around a harbor at night and meets a Turkish sailor. In broken Italian sentences, she attempts to tell him about her feelings of disorientation and aimlessness; the sailor repeats, in Turkish, that he cannot understand her, but offers coffee and help. While Antonioni’s scene focuses on the two characters’ failure to communicate, Levi’s reading emphasizes their attempts to do so: they do not have a common language, but they do try to speak to each other. “On both sides … there is the will to communicate,” stresses Levi:We can and must communicate. It is a useful and easy way of contributing to people’s peace of mind, including our own, because silence—the absence of signals—is in itself a signal, but it is ambiguous, and ambiguity produces unease and suspicion.1Human beings, he adds, are “biologically and socially predisposed to communication” because they can speak, and therefore refusing to communicate is ethically wrong (“è colpa”).
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...