feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Article
    Article
    In:  Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (2023) 21-39
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 21-39
    Keywords: Antisemitism Terminology ; History ; Antisemitism History 1945- ; Antisemitism History
    Abstract: In this chapter I retrace the historical “othering” of the Jews through a discussion of the semantic changes in antisemitic discourse centered on the analysis of the words “Judeophobia,” “Anti-Judaism,” and “antisemitism.” Each term raises the issue of deciding at what point their application becomes an anachronism with respect to the reality they aim to describe or a legitimate extension from their original usage. The semantic discussion provides the framework for recounting the history of anti-Jewish prejudice through a broad interpretative schema that considers legal status as the primary criterion of Jewish inclusion within society, stressing its importance in the interplay between state policies and social practices of inclusion and exclusion in pagan, and subsequently Christian and eventually secularized society. Throughout the study, I emphasize the need to critically challenge the terminological validity of the existing terms with respect to specific historical contexts and phases of anti-Jewish prejudice. What emerges from this approach is that the phenomenon of anti-Jewish hostility comes into being within well-defined and, ab origine, asymmetric relations—economic, religious, political, legal, social, and cultural—whose dynamic is shaped by and articulated through specific tropes. I address, by way of conclusion, the semantic shifts in understandings of antisemitism in the post-1945 period, claiming that the Holocaust and the foundation of the State of Israel transformed the history of the Jews as the history of a minority. This transformed in an irreversible way the discourse on antisemitism, and in doing so provided a new vocabulary for rationalizing anti-Jewish prejudice.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Article
    Article
    In:  Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (2023) 235-257
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 235-257
    Keywords: Islamophobia Terminology ; History ; Antisemitism Terminology ; History
    Abstract: Islamophobia and antisemitism are two forms of racism that have much in common. The racialisation targets not just a religion or religious group but what is better understood as an ethnoreligious group. The ways that Jews and Muslims oppose such racism increasingly involves the building up of an identity which, like most contemporary equality movements, does not simply reject the one attributed to them by their enemies but a positive replacement. Such positive conceptions can become oppressor identities, as is the case of certain Islamist identities fostered by the likes of Isis or with a Jewish identity centred on Israel. Moreover, the politics of defining these racisms is tied to competition about prioritisation between anti-racisms. This should be based on an empirical evaluation of the scale of the respective racisms (and not on an essentialised hierarchy). Unfortunately, in the case of Islamophobia and antisemitism today, there is a wilful empirical blindness, and the prioritisation is taking place on the basis of which victim group is more influential and has more influential friends. Finally, we must be able to critically talk about groups like Muslims and Jews, about Islam and Israel, without being dismissed as Islamophobes or antisemites. For this to be the case, ‘talk about’ must become ‘talk with’: the character of the criticism must take a dialogical form. I conclude by including a sketch of five tests for distinguishing racialisation from dialogical criticism.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Article
    Article
    In:  Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (2023) 165-188
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 165-188
    Keywords: Corbyn, Jeremy ; Philosemitism ; Antisemitism History 1945- ; Anti-Zionism ; Christianity and other religions Judaism 1945- ; History
    Abstract: The defeat of the Labour Party in the 2019 general election in Britain has put to rest the tumultuous “Corbyn Affair” (2015–2019). Whether Labour under Corbyn has been “overrun by anti-Semitism or other forms of racism” or, in the words of the Chakrabarti report, polluted by an “occasionally toxic atmosphere” has been hotly debated. Yet the “affair” above all symbolized the crisis of Europe’s postwar philosemitism: the official repudiation and reprobation of antisemitism in mainstream politics; a shift from enmity to partnership in Christian approaches to Judaism; the rise of a positive image of the Jews as symbol of conservative values or post-national European cosmopolitanism; the duty of Shoah remembrance and official atonement; and despite the rise of virulent anti-Zionism in Europe since 1967, the containment of anti-Israeli criticism within the framework of a two-state solution. Hostility toward Jews, to be sure, never disappeared, but philosemitism broadly conceived has redefined the relationship between contemporary Europe and its Jews. The “Corbyn Affair” challenged the terms of this postwar history: the controversy indeed signaled the possible end of Europe’s postwar philosemitic moment.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Article
    Article
    In:  Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (2023) 3-18
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 3-18
    Keywords: Antisemitism Terminology ; History ; Islamophobia Terminology ; History
    Abstract: This chapter examines the value and limits of definitions in addressing antisemitism and Islamophobia, two relatively recent terms conveying a lengthy history of animosity and violence. Both terms have been subject in recent decades to controversy over their meaning and function in political and legal efforts to combat the spread of bigoted prejudice in society. We trace the various, constantly shifting, meanings of the two terms and point to the contingent political contexts that propelled these shifts over time. The dynamic nature of definitions, we argue, stems not only from changing views of the phenomena, but also from the fact that definitions perform a rhetorical function, serving at times to discredit political opponents. Drawing on the chapters collected in this volume, we propose three, interrelated, historical trajectories to understand the politics of definition: the long view, which situates the question of definition within a history of political engagements which have aimed to define Jews, Muslims, and the prejudice against them; the short view, focusing on how key events of the twentieth century affected the nature and political role of definitions of racist prejudice in different contexts; and a critical examination of present-day political efforts to advance definition as a purported key to suppress antisemitism and Islamophobia. We argue that the wish to capture the “essence” of antisemitism and Islamophobia without reckoning with the concepts’ historical and political load neither promotes understanding of the phenomena nor does it effectively help to combat them.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Article
    Article
    In:  Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (2023) 191-209
    Language: English
    Year of publication: 2023
    Titel der Quelle: Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2023) 191-209
    Keywords: International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance ; Antisemitism Terminology ; History
    Abstract: In May 2016, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) adopted a Working Definition of Antisemitism. The definition has, on the one hand, been widely adopted by national governments, public agencies, local authorities, political parties, and other civil society organizations. It has, on the other hand, been hotly disputed in academic circles and in the public square. In this essay, I evaluate both the text in itself and the uses to which predominantly it is put. I conclude, first, that it does not pass muster as a definition: it is neither clear nor coherent nor sound. Second, not only does it fail to set limits to legitimate speech about Zionism and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, but it lends itself to partisan use by one side in the public debate. I conclude by briefly introducing an alternative document, the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism, which sets out to reclaim the word ‘antisemitism’ and to depoliticize it by lifting it above the fray of the public debate.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...